Search for: "State v. Harmon"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,117
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Jun 2011, 3:04 pm
Doing so will both further the general policy of treating unsecured creditors equally and help harmonize the liquidation authority with the Bankruptcy Code, under which the priorities for any unsecured claims are construed narrowly precisely because of the overall goal of treating all unsecured creditors equitably, citing the Supreme Court’s opinion in Begier v. [read post]
28 Apr 2023, 12:06 pm
The court, in Porter v. [read post]
27 Mar 2024, 1:12 am
The last episode of this story is the judgment delivered by the General Court on 21 February 2024 in Case T-361/21, Papouis Dairies Ltd (and others) v the European Commission. [read post]
6 Oct 2017, 9:55 am
In U.S. v. [read post]
30 May 2009, 11:24 pm
The Case of CMS v. [read post]
5 Oct 2020, 8:17 am
On September 8th, a federal Judge largely agreed with the AGs in a 62 page opinion in New York v. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 8:07 am
Council Regulation (EC) No. 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000, on insolvency proceedings (Regulation), deals with proceedings being conducted in one EU Member State, while an insolvency proceedings involving one of the parties to the arbitration agreement was opened in another Member State. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 12:37 pm
That coordination continues a generation long process of networked intermeshing among judiciaries that may go a long way toward the harmonization of approaches to issues toucvhing on human rights within the sometimes quite distinctive domestic legal orders of states. [read post]
10 Aug 2017, 9:38 am
Wheaton v. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:20 am
The Copyright Act explicitly states that works of artistic craftsmanship are protected as artistic works. [read post]
28 Oct 2013, 3:41 am
For example, the Supreme Court decision in Association for Molecular Pathology v Myriad Genetics, Inc. [read post]
24 Jan 2015, 3:29 pm
Opposing counsel had argued for harmonizing Illinois law with other states, but counsel argued that that wasn’t possible – there were sixteen different state statutes, and some expressly gave the privilege to the client. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:13 pm
CLEVENS, Appellant, v. [read post]
16 Dec 2010, 4:47 am
Citizens United indisputably harmonized campaign finance law on the question of the constitutionality of spending limits on corporations, even if its view of Austin as an “outlier” remains contested. [read post]
18 Dec 2010, 11:36 am
Citizens United indisputably harmonized campaign finance law on the question of the constitutionality of spending limits on corporations, even if its view of Austin as an “outlier” remains contested. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 8:19 am
It was United States v. [read post]
12 Jun 2010, 12:25 pm
Citizens United indisputably harmonized campaign finance law on the question of the constitutionality of spending limits on corporations, even if its view of Austin as an “outlier” remains contested. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 9:00 am
Wilkins v. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 10:17 am
Harmon, 54 F.4th 839 (Dec. 13, 2022). [read post]
21 Sep 2013, 2:49 pm
This is not to suggest the odd formalism of Lochner v. [read post]
