Search for: "State v. Harms" Results 621 - 640 of 23,503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2024, 6:00 am by Ed Roggenkamp
On April 24 and 25, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit unanimously upheld two federal district court decisions rejecting challenges to the federal approvals for the Vineyard Wind offshore wind farm in the cases of Nantucket Residents Against Turbines v. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 11:55 am by Eric
The economic losses alleged by plaintiffs are simply mitigation steps to reduce the risk of future harm, and negligence law doesn't recognize these anticipatory steps: the cost of credit monitoring that results...from the risk of possible future harm...is insufficient to state a negligence claim Citing (among others) the Third Circuit's Reilly case and Ruiz v. [read post]
13 Apr 2018, 8:52 am by Louise Pearce
” Applying the principles set out by the Court of Appeal in AMT Futures Ltd v Marzillier [2015] QB 699, the place where the harmful event occurred is the place where the event gives rise to direct damage. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 1:08 pm by Alfred Brophy
 The Court has also clarified that the nature of the injury, that is, the state’s police power interest in protecting the public from harm through tort liability, has a large effect on the outcome of the balancing test. [read post]
5 Oct 2010, 10:36 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
The United States District Court for the Central District of Illinois has issued another opinion in the Noonan v. [read post]
28 Apr 2012, 6:44 pm by Matthew Nied
Because no such requirement exists in Canada, plaintiffs may enjoy a juridical advantage by pursuing their defamation claims in Canada rather than in the United States. [read post]