Search for: "State v. Hobbs"
Results 621 - 640
of 757
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Oct 2014, 9:46 am
Curran, a deputy attorney general from Little Rock, arguing for the state in the case of Holt v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 6:39 am
Hobbs, which involved a Muslim prisoner’s wearing a beard). [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 8:50 am
Hobbs, 13-6827 (ditto); Warger v. [read post]
9 Oct 2021, 12:43 pm
State v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 6:24 am
Consider Lawrence v. [read post]
3 Nov 2016, 2:32 pm
United States overruled United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 12:30 pm
"He also commented that in Interflora 1 (Interflora Inc v Marks and Spencer plc [2012] EWCA Civ 1501 [noted by the IPKat here] Lewison L.J. had stated that different considerations from the general position on surveys apply where the issue is whether a registered mark has acquired distinctiveness. [read post]
18 May 2023, 5:01 am
no state constitution has even gone the way of Hobbes. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 6:15 am
The case presents the question whether a Hobbs Act conspiracy to commit extortion requires that the conspirators agree to obtain property from someone outside the conspiracy. [read post]
25 Jan 2007, 12:48 am
United States, 17 F.3d 890, 901 (6th Cir. 1994); Albrecht v. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 11:04 am
From Thursday's Finchem v. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 6:30 am
In a country (and culture) that sometimes appears to believe that prevention of even one terrorist attack justifies immense costs in terms both of money and deprivations of ordinary liberty, it is at least worth noting the remarkable indifference of much of the public—and certainly the whole of the Republican Party—to the costs attached to offering the kind of capacious interpretation of the Second Amendment instantiated in the recent case of New York State Rifle & Pistol… [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 6:40 am
Hobbs, Dir., Ark. [read post]
12 Oct 2011, 7:45 am
Hobbs, Dir., Ark. [read post]
31 Jul 2018, 11:49 am
Current Builders of Florida, Inc., 7 So. 3d 1132, 1134–35 (Fla. 4th DCA 2009); see also Hobbs Const. [read post]
7 Nov 2018, 8:46 am
In Hurst v. [read post]
13 Jan 2021, 11:05 am
United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 9:36 am
Hobbs (10-9647); the Court granted review of the two separately, but said that it will hear oral arguments in them back-to-back. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 5:07 am
U.S. v. [read post]
8 Jan 2019, 12:31 am
Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) – On November 13, the Supreme Court agreed to decide whether the Hobbs Act (also known as the Administrative Orders Review Act) requires the district court to accept the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) interpretation of the TCPA, in PDR Network, LLC v. [read post]
