Search for: "State v. Hodge"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,341
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Feb 2017, 9:26 am
Quinta Jurecic posted the Lawfare Podcast: Goldsmith v. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Hodges,[11] in which the Court recognized a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, Judge Aiken stated that the plaintiffs had identified a fundamental right: the right to a “climate system capable of sustaining human life. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Hodges,[11] in which the court recognized a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, Judge Aiken stated that the plaintiffs had identified a fundamental right: the right to a “climate system capable of sustaining human life. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Hodges,[11] in which the Court recognized a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, Judge Aiken stated that the plaintiffs had identified a fundamental right: the right to a “climate system capable of sustaining human life. [read post]
31 Jan 2017, 11:43 am
Hodges,[11] in which the Court recognized a constitutional right to same-sex marriage, Judge Aiken stated that the plaintiffs had identified a fundamental right: the right to a “climate system capable of sustaining human life. [read post]
29 Jan 2017, 4:08 pm
As already mentioned, on 24, 25 and 26 January 2017, the Supreme Court (Lords Neuberger, Mance, Sumption, Hughes and Hodge) heard the joined appeals in the cases of Flood v Times Newspapers, Miller v Associated Newspapers and Frost v MGN. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 9:01 pm
The Trump Court may undo this, and overrule the gay marriage case (Obergefell v. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am
The biggest legal story of this coming week will be the judgment of the Supreme Court in the case of R (Miller) v Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union – the Article 50 “Brexit” judgment. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 7:05 am
Hodges, the Supreme Court’s 2015 decision striking state down laws banning same-sex marriage. [read post]
10 Jan 2017, 7:27 am
Hodges, 135 S. [read post]
9 Jan 2017, 2:58 am
As was said in Salvesen v Riddell 2013 SC (UKSC) 236 (Lord Hope at para 57), if such an order is made, it may be appropriate to give permission to the Lord Advocate to return to the court for any further orders under section 102(2)(b) as may be required. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 4:21 pm
Douglas, in Doe V. [read post]
22 Dec 2016, 5:17 am
This judgment triggered some further recriminations despite the fact that Lady Hale, Lord Wilson, Lord Carnwath, Lord Hughes and Lord Hodge unanimously dismissed Mirza, Iqbal and Ehsan’s appeals. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
Hodges, ––– U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:57 am
Hodges, ––– U.S. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 3:30 am
Hodges, 576 U.S. __ (2015)). [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
7 Dec 2016, 2:11 am
15.56 Lord Mance asks if it would be a “catastrophe” for the devolution settlement if the legislative consent convention was not legally binding. 15.55 In response to questions from Lord Mance and Lord Kerr, the Lord Advocate notes that, in the current constitutional context, the UK Parliament has committed itself in statute to seeking the legislative consent of the Scottish Parliament on “devolved matters”. 15.50 The two Scottish Justices – Lord Reed and Lord… [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 12:02 pm
Hodges, finding that same-sex couples have the fundamental right to marry and states may not refuse to recognize a lawful same-sex marriage. [read post]
