Search for: "State v. Items of Property"
Results 621 - 640
of 2,963
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Sep 2015, 2:50 am
The legal guardian of the property stated that he had not given the defendant permission or authority to paint his property. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 9:50 am
In most personal injury lawsuits, whether the claims arise from a car accident or a fall on another’s property, the likelihood of achieving a monetary recovery will depend on several items. [read post]
30 Aug 2012, 7:59 pm
Citing Johnson v. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:30 am
Hayrapetyan v. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 12:00 pm
According to the Newsday.com report, the acquisition of a neighbor’s land by adverse possession “will not happen simply because a fence, hedge, shrub, shed or other minimal, nonstructural item is placed across the deeded property line. [read post]
11 Jul 2008, 12:00 pm
According to the Newsday.com report, the acquisition of a neighbor’s land by adverse possession “will not happen simply because a fence, hedge, shrub, shed or other minimal, nonstructural item is placed across the deeded property line. [read post]
3 Dec 2007, 3:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
27 Oct 2007, 9:48 pm
State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2017, 6:55 am
State v. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 8:40 am
United States v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 9:05 pm
State v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 12:14 pm
” State v. [read post]
31 May 2011, 2:36 pm
The case was Macias v. [read post]
30 Mar 2020, 1:36 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 10:01 am
The purchaser did not raise the issue at closing, and thereafter spent approximately $17,000 to remove the items left by the seller. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 3:36 am
Because the initial seizure was reasonable, the Second Circuit held that the defendants’ failure to return property did “not, by itself, state a separate Fourth Amendment claim of unreasonable seizure. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
In Kwickset v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:52 am
In Kwickset v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 7:05 am
Cockrill v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 9:58 am
Here are the links to the additional cases and other items I mentioned (or wanted to mention) in my session on Public Use and Pretext Update: Proving Eminent Domain Pretext In Serial Takings - County of Hawaii v. [read post]
