Search for: "State v. Judge"
Results 621 - 640
of 73,162
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 Apr 2018, 12:41 pm
S. 61 (1975) (per curiam)United States v. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 9:25 pm
Judge Archer was born in my home state of Kansas and left to attend Yale in the late 1940's. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:20 pm
So what has our State done with the hundreds of persons currently being incarcerated in New York state based on violations of PRS not imposed by judges? [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 9:23 am
The decision closely follows the recent 5-4 Supreme Court [official website] decision issued earlier this week in Arizona Free Enterprise Club's Freedom Club PAC v. [read post]
18 Mar 2021, 9:34 am
Twitter First Voters Reject Tulsi Gabbard, Then a Judge Does–Gabbard v. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 2:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 May 2009, 2:40 am
Pursuant to the standard elucidated in NAACP v. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 2:45 pm
The trial judge and CCA rejected this argument.At CAAF, appellant decided to retool the argument. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 5:32 am
CAAF heard oral argument in United States v. [read post]
6 Jul 2024, 8:27 am
Fischer v. [read post]
7 Jun 2018, 6:02 am
United States Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Southern District of California United States District Judge Dana Sabraw denied the government's motion to... [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 10:26 pm
DISMISSED – Driving on a Suspended License, State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2012, 6:36 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 3:31 pm
Judge Leonard Davis of Tyler authored Bocanegra v. [read post]
18 Feb 2021, 6:53 am
That is precisely the approach Judge Bonello raised in his separate and concurring opinion in Al-Skeini and Others v. the United Kingdom. [read post]
8 Jul 2024, 5:00 am
§458 to Presidential Appointments of Federal Judges, 19 Op. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am
The Supreme Court’s cert grant last June in Moore v. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 6:59 pm
CAAF released this 3-2 decision today in United States v. [read post]
2 Jul 2021, 4:27 am
In Secretary of State for Health v Servier Laboratories Ltd, where the loss arose because there were no generic equivalents of the invalidly-patented drug, the Supreme Court held that the "dealing requirement" laid down in OBG Ltd v Allan [2008] 1 AC 1, which states that the unlawful means should have affected the third party’s freedom to deal with the claimant, is a necessary element of the tort. [read post]
14 Dec 2015, 9:07 am
On December 8, 2015, the Supreme Court decided Shapiro v. [read post]
