Search for: "State v. Lawrence" Results 621 - 640 of 3,070
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2008, 1:30 am
" You can access today's transcript of oral argument in Van de Kamp v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:19 pm by John A. Gallagher
Windsor, striking down a federal law denying benefits to married same-sex couples.*  Exactly 12 years ago to the day, Justice Kennedy's decision in Lawrence v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 10:04 am by Kiera Flynn
At The Volokh Conspiracy, Orin Kerr analyzes the government’s brief in the GPS tracking case, United States v. [read post]
4 Dec 2006, 6:15 am
Lawrence Solum (University of Illinois, Law & Philosophy) has posted Constitutional Possibilities on SSRN. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 6:24 am by James Bickford
United States, while the Des Moines Register reports on Pepper v. [read post]
In Grange Ins Co of Michigan v Lawrence,[3] the Michigan Supreme Court made clear that domicile meant something difference than residency. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 3:48 am by Broc Romanek
The SEC is seeking a rehearing because the same court granted en banc rehearing in American Meat Institute v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 6:19 am by Amy Howe
At the Council of State Governments’ Knowledge Center, Lisa Soronen looks back at last month’s argument in Sturgeon v. [read post]
17 Apr 2007, 3:14 pm
NUI Cork T/A Cork University Press [2000] IEHC 70 and Sweeney v. [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 6:02 pm
The August 10 order to vacate, issued by US District  Judge Lawrence Stengel, stated that "by separate written communication . . . the Court shall direct LexisNexis and Westlaw to remove the Decisions and Orders listed below from their respective legal research services/databases. [read post]
8 May 2024, 3:01 pm by Micah Belden
Lawrence, 727 F.3d 386 (5th Cir. 2019) (United States citizen defendants personally transported drugs on commercial airplanes from South America to United Kingdom); United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2013, 2:29 pm by Deborah Hellman
  However, Kennedy uses the word dignity (or indignity) a total of 10 times in his fairly short opinion – signaling the importance of an interest that he used to invalidate a Texas law criminalizing non-coital sex in Lawrence v. [read post]