Search for: "State v. Lucas"
Results 621 - 640
of 695
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Feb 2009, 1:32 am
Conn. 2006); Lucas v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 12:02 am
Lucas v. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 2:24 pm
United States, No. 98-419L (Court of Federal Claims, Jan. 23, 2009), a massive opinion (84 single-spaced pages) with what at first glance seems to delve into just about every regulatory takings theory known: temporary takings, categorical takings, partial takings, parcel-as-a-whole, Mahon, Penn Central, First English, Lucas, Tahoe-Sierra, Seiber, delay, and ripeness. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:26 am
" State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
14 Jan 2009, 7:26 am
" State of Rhode Island v. [read post]
6 Dec 2008, 1:15 pm
, Ugo Mattei and Luca Pes 17. [read post]
12 Nov 2008, 2:41 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Nov 2008, 7:02 pm
Procedural History The owners filed an inverse condemnation action, claiming that, under Lucas v. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:49 pm
Pruitt, No. 06-6002 Given the particular characteristics of North Carolina sentencing law, in light of recent United States Supreme Court precedent, in determining whether to apply the career offender provision of the United States Sentencing Guidelines, a federal court must take into account the defendant's state criminal history (or lack thereof) at the time of his predicate North Carolina convictions. [read post]
24 Oct 2008, 3:54 pm
New York State Elec. [read post]
23 Oct 2008, 5:42 pm
Monks et al. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2008, 2:11 pm
The Solicitor General had urged the Court to deny review in Lucas v. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 10:11 pm
" (Lucas v. [read post]
28 Sep 2008, 3:19 am
Lucas v. [read post]
25 Sep 2008, 6:07 pm
(University of Maryland)Lucas Robert (University of Chicago - Nobel Laureate)Luttmer Erzo G.J. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:20 pm
Lucas Foote v Piscotti, held that persons charged with violating the terms of post release supervision not imposed by judges are entitled to immediate release. [read post]
24 Sep 2008, 9:17 pm
Lucas Foote v Piscotti the Fourth Department answered this question with a clear "yes. [read post]
22 Sep 2008, 11:14 am
Dretke, 372 F.3d 748, 757 (5th Cir.2004); Lucas v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 11:53 pm
WebFeats, and in 2004, in Lucas Nursery v Grosse, that the use of a trademark in a domain name for a web site that comments on the trademark holder is not actionable. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 4:29 pm
Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=928656 Abstract: In his majority opinion in Lucas v. [read post]
