Search for: "State v. Maker"
Results 621 - 640
of 4,659
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Feb 2017, 11:29 am
So the Washington state Supreme Court unanimously held this morning, in State v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:25 pm
In Grant v. [read post]
21 Oct 2016, 12:25 pm
In Grant v. [read post]
9 Aug 2008, 7:14 pm
The maker of HENDRIX ELECTRIC vodka infringes three JIMI HENDRIX trademarks owned by the licensing company that controls the late musician’s marks. [read post]
1 Oct 2015, 1:31 pm
The Upper Tribunal (Administrative Appeals) seems to have taken an opportunity to re-state, in clear terms, one of the findings of SSWP v David Nelson and Fife Council [2014] UKUT 0525 (AAC) [Our report here]. [read post]
6 Jan 2012, 1:25 pm
We just received from defense counsel Matt Wender at Pietragallo Gordon a copy of Moore v. [read post]
21 Dec 2015, 1:06 pm
In Kerin v. [read post]
3 Jun 2020, 9:29 am
” – Professor Daniel Tanovich @dtanovich In R v S. [read post]
5 Jan 2018, 9:10 am
The decision-maker considers X’s application in identity Y and citizenship is granted in that identity. [read post]
1 Mar 2020, 8:23 am
Bird Yelp, Twitter and Facebook Aren’t State Actors–Quigley v. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 6:48 am
See Aikens v. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:04 am
I own all of my masters and publishing and have maintained full creative control of my project and remain the sole, final decision maker. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 1:05 am
If you want to learn more about the details of this doctrine check out the Supreme Court’s 2013 decision in Federal Trade Commission v. [read post]
20 Oct 2016, 4:31 pm
Where ordinary private law principles apply, the rationality of the decision maker may be irrelevant. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 6:31 am
In Impression Products v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 12:12 pm
The December 4 opinion in Kinetic Co. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2008, 11:41 pm
Yesterday, in State Farm v. [read post]
29 Mar 2010, 11:55 am
‘A different rule,’ as was said in Camfield v. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 12:43 am
The decision-maker thought that it was reasonable for him and his parents to return to Sri Lanka because the family did not have leave to remain. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 11:52 am
SA v. [read post]
