Search for: "State v. Mark"
Results 621 - 640
of 19,775
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2021, 6:40 am
Although Gideon marks the recognition of the Sixth Amendment right to counsel as a fundamental right applicable in state cases, it reinforces the... [read post]
30 May 2008, 4:06 pm
Gary Owens and Mark Manna won a life sentence in State v. [read post]
19 Nov 2024, 1:05 am
State Plumbing & Pipefitting Indus. [read post]
16 Oct 2012, 2:05 pm
By Mark Apostolos, Albany Government Law Review[1] Product manufacturers are generally required by state law to sell a product that: (1) is free of design or manufacturing defects, and (2) carries appropriate warnings putting customers on notice as to the … Continue reading → [read post]
9 Jan 2007, 9:28 am
By Scott HerveyOn October 31, 2005, adult film actress Mary Cook filed a trademark registration application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office to register the mark MARY CAREY for motion pictures featuring adult entertainment, and a series of... [read post]
15 Aug 2014, 1:24 am
MeUndies, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 6:30 am
Marking should benefit those who practice the patent, but the current state of the law benefits those who don’t. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 10:37 am
Stauffer v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:06 am
***See alsoOf the appealed Georgia-Pacific case-->Georgia-pacific Corporation, Appellant, v. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 7:45 am
Case date: 01 June 2022 Case number: No 21-1107 Court: United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit A full summary of this case has been published on Kluwer IP Law. [read post]
21 Jan 2014, 5:45 am
Carrington and Rohan v. [read post]
13 Feb 2024, 10:02 am
On Monday, February 12, 2024, Professor Mark Graber published a post on Balkinization about the February 8, 2024 oral argument in Trump v. [read post]
15 Apr 2008, 7:15 pm
March 27th marked six months in the United States without an execution. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:14 pm
The Court stated that the acts of advertising and marketing provided by Standard Hotels are part of the acts of use of a trade mark within the meaning of the EU Trade Mark Regulation. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 8:20 am
In Leser v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:59 pm
In most cases involving the abandonment of a still-famous mark--although ill-famed-- the U.S. courts have examined whether a trade mark owner's de minimis use of a mark was sufficient to maintain the owner's exclusive rights Silverman v. [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 9:26 am
Sveen v. [read post]
29 Nov 2018, 2:03 am
In particular, Kitchin LJ in Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp [2017] EWCA Civ 1834 considered a number of rulings of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) in the context of ‘targeting’ towards specific Member States. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
The courts in the United States do not recognize the "well-known mark" basis for relief (but see Grupo Gigante v. [read post]
