Search for: "State v. Marks" Results 621 - 640 of 19,464
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
This was because the curved shape towards the inside of the sign from both ends of the black element differ from the ordinary representation of the letter ‘v’ and thus made it closer to the representation of a heart.Novartis v EUIPO concerned situations in which the trade mark applied for was either a three-dimensional mark consisting of the appearance of the designated goods, or a figurative mark consisting of a two-dimensional representation… [read post]
3 May 2009, 3:06 am
***See alsoOf the appealed Georgia-Pacific case-->Georgia-pacific Corporation, Appellant, v. [read post]
21 Sep 2022, 12:14 pm by Giorgio Luceri
The Court stated that the acts of advertising and marketing provided by Standard Hotels are part of the acts of use of a trade mark within the meaning of the EU Trade Mark Regulation. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 1:59 pm
In most cases involving the abandonment of a still-famous mark--although ill-famed-- the U.S. courts have examined whether a trade mark owner's de minimis use of a mark was sufficient to maintain the owner's exclusive rights Silverman v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 10:00 pm by Chijioke Okorie
Being so misconceived, the court stated that the objection lacked merit and was thus dismissed. [read post]
19 Aug 2008, 12:01 pm
Prasco LLC v Medicis Pharmaceutical Corp. and Imaginative Research (Fed. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 2:11 am
 The TMO’s Practice Notice on sound marks states that a Canadian sound mark application should: 1. state that the application is for the registration of a sound mark; 2. contain a drawing that graphically represents the sound; 3. contain a description of the sound; and 4. contain an electronic recording of the sound in MP3 or WAVE format recorded on a CD or DVD, with a maximum file size of 5MB. [read post]
Justice Sotomayor filed an opinion concurring in part and dissenting in part, in which Justice Breyer joined (Iancu v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 1:53 am by sally
Wintersteiger AG v Products 4U Sondermaschinenbau GmbH (Case C-523/10); [2012] WLR (D) 117 “Article 5(3) of Council Regulation (EC) No 44/2001 of 22 December 2000 on jurisdiction and the recognition and enforcement of judgments in civil and commercial matters meant that an action relating to infringement of a trade mark registered in a member state because of the use, by an advertiser, of a keyword identical to that trade mark on a search engine website… [read post]
15 Dec 2006, 8:54 am
Mark Orr won a misdemeanor battery conviction in State v. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 4:35 pm
The courts in the United States do not recognize the "well-known  mark" basis for relief (but see Grupo Gigante v. [read post]