Search for: "State v. National Advertising Co."
Results 621 - 640
of 787
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2010, 5:20 pm
But the Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002 (also known as McCain-Feingold, after its two chief sponsors) forbids political advertisements paid for by corporations in the weeks before a primary. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 10:37 am
Laurette Co., Inc., No. 08 Civ. 5065 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 9:35 am
Laurette Co., Inc., No. 08 Civ. 5065 (LAK) (S.D.N.Y. [read post]
26 Jun 2010, 10:56 am
Ugurlayan, Senior Staff Attorney, National Advertising Division: Factors NAD considers in puffery determinations—are these general matters that can’t be proven or disproved? [read post]
23 Jun 2010, 3:51 pm
Div. 1981); State v. [read post]
4 Jun 2010, 5:00 am
American Broadcasting Cos. 18 William & Mary L. [read post]
3 Jun 2010, 12:13 pm
National Union Fire Ins. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 11:05 pm
United States (Gray on Claims) CAFC: Orion v Hyundai on novelty: Expanding the scope of a printed publication with oral testimony (Patently-O) District Court N D Illinois: False marking includes marking with expired patent number: ZOJO Solutions Inc. v. [read post]
13 May 2010, 1:40 pm
Florida Power & Light Co., 511 U.S. 222 (1994). [read post]
11 May 2010, 4:53 am
Wright, a marketing and advertising agency, had been engaged by Sears Canada to assist in the development of a national youth talent competition which it proposed be called CANADIAN IDOL. [read post]
7 May 2010, 10:00 pm
Paul, Rust v. [read post]
7 May 2010, 2:01 am
CNRV, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Apr 2010, 9:22 pm
Citing MID Sydney Pty Ltd v Australian Tourism Co Ltd (1998) 90 FCR 236, traders conducting their business from the Chifley Tower building in Sydney would not have infringed the plaintiff's trade mark ("Chifley Tower") if they used that name in good faith as the name of their place of business. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 12:08 pm
” Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
His successor could take a broader view of the extent to which federal law controls, which would allow fewer state-law tort suits to proceed. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 9:11 am
However, in The Forest Group v Bon Tool Co., 2009-1044 (Fed. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 4:32 am
The respondents have stated in their application that the allegations made in the petition arise out of the Joint Venture Agreement (hereinafter referred to as JVA) dated January, 7, 1994 between the petitioner and the respondent, wherein under Article 11, the parties have agreed to refer and determine all claims, disputes, controversies, disagreements, all differences between the parties arising out of or in connection with the agreement by arbitration. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Coleman Co., Inc. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 3:53 pm
Coleman Co., Inc. [read post]
