Search for: "State v. Pound" Results 621 - 640 of 3,412
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2014, 1:18 am by Laura Sandwell
A v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Scotland), heard 22 – 23 January 2014. [read post]
11 Jan 2012, 8:21 am by John Elwood
United States, 11-7328; Parker v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
Hunt & Ors v Optima (Cambridge) Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 681 (TCC)This is a brief note on what was a complex case arising out of what, by any measure, appears to have been a very poor construction and subsequent maintenance of a new build block of flats. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 6:02 am by Giles Peaker
Hunt & Ors v Optima (Cambridge) Ltd & Ors [2013] EWHC 681 (TCC)This is a brief note on what was a complex case arising out of what, by any measure, appears to have been a very poor construction and subsequent maintenance of a new build block of flats. [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 4:57 am by BEN HENRIQUES, CORKER BINNING
In both R v Soneju [2005] UKHL 49 and R v Knights [2005] UKHL 50, the House of Lords was concerned with a breach of the then applicable six-month time limit for making a confiscation order. [read post]
18 Dec 2011, 11:50 pm by Tessa Shepperson
A report linked to from Destin states that TDS were furious at this sentance which they felt was unduly lenient. [read post]
16 Feb 2022, 4:08 pm by INFORRM
The Supreme Court yesterday handed down judgment in ZXC v Bloomberg LP [2022] UKSC 5. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm by Dave
  Alternatively, drawing on Thlimmenos v Greece (2001) 31 EHRR 15, the right is also violated “when states without an objective and reasonable justification fail to treat differently persons whose situations are significantly different”. [read post]
21 May 2012, 12:54 pm by Dave
  Alternatively, drawing on Thlimmenos v Greece (2001) 31 EHRR 15, the right is also violated “when states without an objective and reasonable justification fail to treat differently persons whose situations are significantly different”. [read post]
20 Apr 2006, 10:45 pm
The dispute was initially brought by the OFT against several credit card comanies to make sure that they fulfilled their obligations under s75 of the UK Consumer Credit Act, which states that credit card suppliers can be sued by their customers in case of breach of contract or misrepresentation on the part of the supplier of goods and services for transactions between £100 and £30,000. [read post]
26 Apr 2020, 9:01 am by Giles Peaker
Damages at the less serious end of the Vento guidelines of £2000, plus Simmons v Castle uplift of 10% totalling £2200. [read post]