Search for: "State v. Priest" Results 621 - 640 of 721
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Nov 2009, 1:04 am
Daines NEW YORK COUNTY Employment By Asserting Claim Under CEPA, Priest Waives All Other Rights, Remedies of Retaliation Claims Hoatson v. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 10:19 am by Susan Brenner
(And the same principle underlies other evidentiary privileges, like the doctor-patient privilege or the priest-penitent privilege.) [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:24 pm
  He focuses on Justice Stevens' and Scalia's dissents in the dismissal of the certified question in United States v. [read post]
31 Oct 2009, 2:12 pm
In Hoatson v New York Archdiocese, (NY S.Ct., Oct. 26, 2009), a New York trial court dismissed claims brought against the Congregation of Christian Brothers, various clergy, the Archdiocese of New York and the Diocese of Albany by a priest who claimed that he had been sexually abused by fellow priests for 12 years. [read post]
12 Oct 2009, 9:15 pm
The Sisters of Bon Secours in the United States, Incorporated v. [read post]
9 Oct 2009, 9:13 am
The Doe case involved a claim of sexual abuse by a Catholic priest that allegedly occurred in 1984. [read post]
7 Oct 2009, 11:41 pm
  Via Eugene Volokh, the issue arose in a California case, People v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
New York Times Co. et al.: The Roman Catholic Diocese of Bridgeport, Conn. lost its appeal today when the Court refused to delay the release of legal documents from child sex-abuse lawsuits against priests. [read post]
29 Sep 2009, 2:26 pm
Illinois sexual abuse victims and their attorneys were severely disappointed with the September 24, 2009, Illinois Supreme Court decision in Doe v. [read post]
3 Jul 2009, 4:00 am
Sexual favoritism which becomes pervasive to the extent of creating a hostile work environment [Priest v Rotary, 634 FSupp 571].See, also, Fella v County of Rockland, 297 A.D.2d 813, where the court, citing DeCintio, explained that there is no sexual discrimination or harassment involved "where the conduct complained of by the employee involves an isolated act of preferential treatment of another employee due to a romantic, consensual relationship. [read post]