Search for: "State v. Primes"
Results 621 - 640
of 3,248
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jul 2009, 5:30 am
Luther v. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:39 pm
While R(MA & Ors) v SS DWP had found that “Meantime, local authorities retain their discretion as to the administration of DHPs. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 1:39 pm
While R(MA & Ors) v SS DWP had found that “Meantime, local authorities retain their discretion as to the administration of DHPs. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:57 am
Brown Co., Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 8:51 am
In New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
15 Sep 2015, 5:44 am
While the Supreme Court ruling in 2012′s National Federation of Independent Business et al v Sebelius in 2012 (when SCOTUS ruled that ACA was constitutional) allowed states to expand their Medicaid coverage under ACA in exchange for new funds (assuming that they agreed to the terms and conditions), it also gave states an out. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
New London, 545 U.S. 469 (2005), which my organization, the Institute for Justice, litigated, is of course a prime example. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 7:46 am
The solicitation stated that “[p]rojects performed by other contractors than the offeror, such as teaming partners or subcontractors, will not be evaluated as prime contractor experience or prime contractor past performance, unless those other contractors are part of a joint venture offeror as demonstrated by a signed joint venture agreement. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 5:01 am
Prime, in turn, placed the commercial general liability policy with the defendant State National Insurance Company (hereinafter SNIC), an insurance carrier. [read post]
19 Sep 2020, 8:08 pm
An example of this occurred in the case of Gray v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 9:50 am
Facts: This case (Lifeguard Licensing Corp. et al v. [read post]
2 May 2011, 12:10 pm
The Court granted review of CompuCredit Corp., et al., v. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 3:20 pm
States, SE & SW Areas Health & Welfare Fund v. [read post]
14 Mar 2022, 4:51 am
The Ofshtein defendants moved jointly with the defendants Prime Four, Inc., 242 Wood Food, Inc., and Prime Six, Inc. [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:35 am
There is no exemption for severely disabled children whose disability prevents them from sharing.The Prime Minister was almost certainly referring to the Court of Appeal’s decision in Burnip, Trengove and Gorry v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2). [read post]
8 Mar 2013, 2:35 am
There is no exemption for severely disabled children whose disability prevents them from sharing.The Prime Minister was almost certainly referring to the Court of Appeal’s decision in Burnip, Trengove and Gorry v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (2). [read post]
9 Nov 2009, 1:22 am
District Court for the Southern District of New York granted the defendants' motion to dismiss in Cornwell v. [read post]
17 Mar 2021, 8:45 am
., LLC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2014, 8:04 am
Case citation: Hardin v. [read post]
8 Sep 2020, 9:07 am
(Cites to Erie, State Farm). [read post]
