Search for: "State v. Race" Results 621 - 640 of 9,628
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Nov 2011, 1:54 pm by CrimProf BlogEditor
Justice Alito's statement in support of denying review, joined by Justices Scalia and Breyer, in Buck v. [read post]
4 May 2010, 5:23 pm by Alfred Brophy
 In the immediate years after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. [read post]
14 Aug 2008, 5:01 am
Joining a new group of "cultural-legal historians," the author looks beyond the legal language of Southern legislatures and high courts, and focuses instead on the surviving local and trial records of one case: State v. [read post]
2 Feb 2022, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Academic freedom protects such criticism, including a hypothetical statement such as "Objectively best pick for Biden is Sri Srinivasan, who is solid prog & v smart…. [read post]
13 Aug 2021, 11:00 am by Maurice W. McLaughlin
  In this case the alleged harassment was based on an employee’s race and ethnicity in violation of New Jersey’s Law Against Discrimination. [read post]
3 Dec 2013, 2:27 pm
Co., 427 U.S. 273, 278–79, 96 S.Ct. 2574, 49 L.Ed.2d 493 (1976) (stating that Title VII is “not limited to discrimination against members of any particular race”).Burlington v. [read post]
9 Jun 2016, 4:34 am by Amy Howe
” At Townhall, Jonathan Wood weighs in on last week’s ruling in United States Army Corps of Engineers v. [read post]
9 Apr 2024, 1:36 pm by Howard Bashman
” Jack Healy and Kellen Browning of The New York Times report that “Arizona Reinstates 160-Year-Old Abortion Ban; The state’s highest court said the law, moribund for decades under Roe v. [read post]
22 Oct 2020, 4:43 pm by INFORRM
On 6 October 2020, Drag Race UK participant Crystal publicly announced her intention to pursue a defamation action against actor and aspiring politician Laurence Fox after calling her a ‘paedophile’ on Twitter. [read post]
18 Oct 2011, 8:44 am by Elizabeth Prochaska, Matrix Chambers.
Not since R (Baiai) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2008] UKHL 53 (where foreign nationals were required to obtain the Secretary of State’s permission to get married) has there been such an obvious case of a disproportionate immigration measure. [read post]