Search for: "State v. Rank" Results 621 - 640 of 3,631
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Feb 2021, 4:43 pm by Rob Robinson
Editor’s Note: These are the results of the sixth semi-annual Predictive Coding Technologies and Protocols Survey conducted by ComplexDiscovery. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 7:00 am by Matt Cooper
In non-Presidential election cases, Election Law at Ohio State is now tracking a case in Alaska challenging the state’s adoption of ranked-choice voting: Kohlhaas v. [read post]
12 Feb 2021, 3:00 am by Jim Sedor
With free legal aid from National Right to Work Legal Defense Foundation, Geary filed a federal complaint arguing the union infringed on her constitutionally protected rights under the foundation-won CWA v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 1:25 am by Florian Mueller
I plan to attend the appellate hearing, which I guess will take place in a couple of months.UNOFFICIAL TRANSLATION OF THE KEY PASSAGES OF THE DECISION (with my explanations in [brackets]):In NetDoktor.de v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 11:58 am by Matt Cooper
In non-Presidential election cases, Election Law at Ohio State is now tracking a case in Alaska challenging the state’s adoption of ranked-choice voting: Kohlhaas v. [read post]
7 Feb 2021, 6:20 am
The process involves  the determination, by that group, of the constituent parts of the ideal liberal democratic state, the transformation of those ideals into measurable objects, and the valuation of those objects (in themselves) and within  an aggregated set of relationships (the quantitative analytics) that then permit two forms of ranking. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 5:00 am by Daphne Keller
Some things like chronological ranking, user-voted ranking, and search results are carved out – platforms can do those things without losing immunity. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:50 am by Daphne Keller
How sloppy can the state mandate be before its speech-suppression consequences are so clear that courts should step in and, like the court in CDT v. [read post]
22 Jan 2021, 6:49 am by Daphne Keller
How sloppy can the state mandate be before its speech-suppression consequences are so clear that courts should step in and, like the court in CDT v. [read post]