Search for: "State v. Sample" Results 621 - 640 of 4,543
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2021, 2:58 am by Cyberleagle
This is the kind of argument that succeeded in the Marper case on blanket retention of DNA, fingerprint and cellular samples. [read post]
6 Jun 2021, 12:59 pm by David Cole
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit (Koala v. [read post]
2 Jun 2021, 2:57 pm
  Plus it's in state court, which means he likely gets out in two and a half. [read post]
1 Jun 2021, 6:30 am by Sandy Levinson
  For example, I’ve long taught the fascinating case of Elkison v. [read post]
22 May 2021, 12:04 pm by admin
Judge Viscomi conducted a Rule 104 hearing on the admissibility of testing of plaintiffs’ expert witness, William Longo, on crowd-sourced samples of baby powder, without chain of custody or provenance evidence. [read post]
18 May 2021, 5:01 am by George Croner
Targeting, however, is constrained by specific limitations included by Congress that prohibit targeting anyone known to be in the United States; prohibit targeting any U.S. person located outside the United States; prohibit targeting someone outside the United States for the purpose of targeting a particular, known person in this country; prohibit the intentional acquisition of any communication where all participants are located in the United States at the time… [read post]
11 May 2021, 3:04 pm by CAFE
United States (2018)“Petite Policy,” Department of JusticeAndy McCarthy, “The DOJ’s Abusive Indictment of the Police Who Killed George Floyd,” National Review, 5/8/21Minnesota v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 3:04 pm by CAFE
United States (2018)“Petite Policy,” Department of JusticeAndy McCarthy, “The DOJ’s Abusive Indictment of the Police Who Killed George Floyd,” National Review, 5/8/21Minnesota v. [read post]
5 May 2021, 12:11 pm by Evelyn Douek
The sample size is still small, so making generalizations remains unwise, but this does suggest that the FOB is less speech-absolutist than some critics feared. [read post]