Search for: "State v. Sotomayor"
Results 621 - 640
of 5,860
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Nov 2010, 8:21 am
The United States Supreme Court heard oral arguments Tuesday in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
4 Mar 2024, 12:47 pm
Concluding that it4 TRUMP v. [read post]
7 Aug 2011, 1:12 pm
The majority in Bullcoming comprised Justices Ginsburg, Sotomayor, Kagan, Scalia, and Thomas. [read post]
3 May 2009, 7:57 am
United States v. [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 9:30 pm
By Mike Dorf On Wednesday, the Supreme Court heard oral argument in Arizona v. [read post]
27 Jun 2017, 11:23 am
But the Court’s 2008 decision in Boumediene v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 8:36 am
On May 21, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Taniguchi v. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 6:16 pm
A. v. [read post]
12 Jun 2018, 5:24 am
“Sonia Sotomayor’s Dissent in the Big Voter-Purge Case Points to How the Law Might Still Be Struck Down”: Law professor Richard L. [read post]
18 Mar 2015, 8:39 am
On March 24, 2015, the United States Supreme Court issued its Opinion in Omnicare, Inc., Et Al. v. [read post]
20 Jul 2012, 11:11 am
U.S. v. [read post]
18 Aug 2016, 2:29 pm
On June 9, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Puerto Rico v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:42 am
On June 17, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Arizona v. [read post]
20 Jun 2013, 10:42 am
On June 17, 2013, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Arizona v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 2:37 pm
On March 1, 2016, the Supreme Court decided Gobeille v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 5:38 pm
On March 20, 2012 the Supreme Court announced its decision in Martinez v. [read post]
5 Jul 2012, 3:56 pm
On June 18, 2012, the Supreme Court announced its decision in Williams v. [read post]
27 Apr 2021, 3:22 pm
State v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 7:04 am
Justice Sonia Sotomayor delivered the opinion of the Court in Collins v. [read post]
13 Jan 2016, 8:45 am
As my colleague Michael Dorf observes in his excellent column yesterday, a key moment in the argument occurred when Justice Sotomayor asked the plaintiff’s attorney whether the state could simply fund unions from tax revenues to assure adequate representation for workers in the collective bargaining process. [read post]
