Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization"
Results 621 - 640
of 3,912
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Mar 2012, 12:21 pm
Payne, 34 A.3d 370 (Conn. 2012); State v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:03 am
The Delaware Supreme Court's recent decision in Gantler v. [read post]
17 Jul 2014, 7:28 am
It also dismissed the due process claim on the ground that MAUM did not use the channels available to it to appeal the Zoning Board’s decision to state court. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 6:07 am
") AC36012 - State v. [read post]
9 May 2012, 5:40 am
She believes that the bill is an attempt to ban abortions without directly challenging the 1973 United States Supreme Court decision of Roe v. [read post]
27 Feb 2015, 2:09 pm
In 2002 the United States Supreme Court decided Hoffman Plastic Compounds, Inc. v NLRB. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 7:48 am
Detroit Board of Education. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 6:15 am
His local draft board rejected the claim, and he appealed to the Kentucky State Appeal Board. [read post]
11 May 2011, 9:46 am
Those cases are equally clear that the website operator is not liable for user-posted defamatory content per 47 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jun 2008, 5:47 pm
Accordingly, the decision of the Board is affirmed.In Todd Allen Clark v. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 8:00 am
By the time the NAACP lawyers embarked on the path that would ultimately lead them to victory in Brown v. [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:00 am
" Although §27 does not define the term "salary," the Appellate Division noted that in Bransten v State of New York, 30 NY3d 434 the Court of Appeals, considering the State Constitution's Judicial Compensation Clause, Article VI, §25[a], and held that the state's employer contributions toward a justice's health insurance coverage "is not part of [his or her] judicial salary" nor considered "a permanent… [read post]
23 May 2019, 4:00 am
" Although §27 does not define the term "salary," the Appellate Division noted that in Bransten v State of New York, 30 NY3d 434 the Court of Appeals, considering the State Constitution's Judicial Compensation Clause, Article VI, §25[a], and held that the state's employer contributions toward a justice's health insurance coverage "is not part of [his or her] judicial salary" nor considered "a permanent… [read post]
9 Apr 2013, 7:40 am
Board of Education is largely forgotten. [read post]
8 Aug 2018, 5:43 am
See also Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 6:24 am
The editorial board of the Washington Post urges the Court to hold that the law is preempted, arguing that “immigration policy would be even more dysfunctional if states were given the green light to craft and enforce their own [immigration] laws” – a sentiment echoed by the editorial board of the New York Times and Kristian Ramos at the Huffington Post. [read post]
28 Nov 2023, 4:15 am
The Board characterized Monster's mark as "three downward jagged and crooked lines of approximately equal size that resemble claw scratches and are connected at right angles. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 9:16 pm
United States and Morgan v. [read post]
8 Nov 2023, 1:33 pm
(Equal Protection Clause; Unlawful Racial Gerrymanders) Historical Eastern Pequot Tribe v. [read post]
15 Sep 2017, 5:45 am
DAVID MORTIMER (A-11-93) (NOTE: This is a companion case to State v. [read post]
