Search for: "State v. State Board of Equalization" Results 621 - 640 of 4,256
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Apr 2011, 2:38 pm by Lyle Denniston
Gore decision on equality in vote-counting to local election contests. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:44 am by Joy Waltemath
Citing New Process Steel, LP v NLRB, which holds that the Board cannot act without a quorum of three members, the D.C. [read post]
1 May 2016, 6:18 am by Howard Friedman
Board of Rabbis of Northern & Southern California, 2016 U.S. [read post]
2 Mar 2019, 2:17 am
Accordingly, the Board was able to limit itself by indicating that the applicant was not entitled to rely on previous decisions of EUIPO in order to reject the finding that the mark applied for was caught by the ground of refusal based on Article 7(1)(b) EUTMR.Moreover, it could not be disputed that the Board of Appeal, in any event, explicitly stated the reason why it departed from the finding made in the previous decision relied upon by the applicant. [read post]
30 Oct 2019, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
At Vox (via How Appealing), Ian Millhiser argues that United States v. [read post]
18 Dec 2008, 7:37 am
Properties owned jointly were to be divided equally between them. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:34 am
All parties, the schools districts, the Wyoming Education Association, the Association of School Boards and the State of Wyoming, appealed various findings by the district court concerning whether the legislative and administrative actions of the state had satisfied the Supreme Court's mandate in State v. [read post]
8 Jan 2008, 5:34 am
All parties, the schools districts, the Wyoming Education Association, the Association of School Boards and the State of Wyoming, appealed various findings by the district court concerning whether the legislative and administrative actions of the state had satisfied the Supreme Court's mandate in State v. [read post]
6 May 2022, 2:25 pm by ACLU
As for individual cases, here are a few: ● Board of Pardons v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:03 am
Texas, decided after the events of this case, clearly established a rule of equal protection relevant here when it overruled Bowers v. [read post]