Search for: "State v. W. M." Results 621 - 640 of 3,516
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Jan 2017, 3:58 pm by Nikki Siesel
It states in part that a mark is abandoned, “[w]hen its use has been discontinued with intent not to resume such use. [read post]
13 Jan 2017, 3:58 pm by Nikki Siesel
It states in part that a mark is abandoned, “[w]hen its use has been discontinued with intent not to resume such use. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:17 pm
Sure, I'm confident that Judge Bybee is correct when he says that "[w]hatever Ocegueda[-Nunez] did to get himself convicted of indecent exposure, we can be fairly confident that it involved more than being a nude dancer at a bar or a 'tasteless prank.'" But why didn't the government simply show that?! [read post]
20 Jan 2014, 5:09 pm
Category: 112 - Means Plus      By: John Kirkpatrick, Contributor  TitleVistan Corp. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2013, 11:59 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s decision in National Australia Bank v. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 7:01 am by Elie Mystal
But our Michigan man took it one step further… The Detroit Free Press reports that Michigan lawyer Robert Tuttle needs to be in the running for Tool of the Year: The state says it simply made a mistake when it allowed Robert Tuttle of Milford to buy a college plate with the well-known block M followed by W-L-V-R-N-E, or wolverine. [read post]
24 Aug 2008, 8:53 pm
M & M Savant Limited v Brown and others LRX/26/2006 It is a shame that this case was decided in 2008, and not in 1998 when it would have had a much greater relevance. [read post]
9 Sep 2016, 12:51 pm
I think it needs to be more, and I think the State's following my previous directive that if they don't have more, I'm going to be suppressing these stops. [read post]