Search for: "State v. Wales" Results 621 - 640 of 1,632
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2021, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
United States Reuters had a piece “Sacha Baron Cohen, Showtime win dismissal of Roy Moore defamation lawsuit”. [read post]
15 Jul 2015, 1:10 pm
This year, professor Halderman and Vanessa Teague of the University of Melbourne discovered a cryptographic flaw in a New South Wales' e-voting system that may have left as many as 66,000 votes vulnerable to surveillance and tampering in that states' most recent election. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Good luck explaining that to the district judges of England and Wales. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 7:05 am by S
Good luck explaining that to the district judges of England and Wales. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On 1 and 2 March 2022 Chamberlain J heard an application for an injunction in the case of HM Attorney-General for England and Wales v BBC. [read post]
19 Jun 2018, 4:49 am by Mark Summerfield
  In these decisions, the Patent Office is continuing to apply its adaptation of the England and Wales Court of Appeals’ four-step test for patentable subject matter, as set out in Aerotel Ltd v Telco Holdings Ltd; Macrossan’s Application, [2006] EWCA Civ 1371 (Aerotel/Macrossan), despite a lack of any clear authority for this approach in Australia.Meanwhile, one of two Federal Court appeals of Patent Office decisions has been terminated following unsuccessful… [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 12:48 pm
These are the articles from September: International: Antarctic Treaty Consultative Meeting XLIV Concludes with Adoption of Several New Measures, Decisions, and Resolutions United Kingdom: Intellectual Property Office Rules Artificial Intelligence Cannot Patent Inventions Israel: Supreme Court Rules Israeli Courts May Void or Change Choice of Law Provisions in Standard Contracts Between Global Companies and Small Businesses Japan: Children and Family Agency Establishment Act Adopted Egypt:… [read post]
22 Oct 2010, 7:18 am by GuestPost
The Board stated that there was an ‘enormous difference’ between an agreement regulating a state of affairs between married couples (a postnup) and an agreement purporting to regulate an uncertain marital future (a prenup). [read post]
26 Jan 2015, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
Michael & Ors v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police & Anor, heard 28 July 2014. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 2:35 am
In this sense, there is probably no need to recall the (endless) series of references for a preliminary ruling on national private copying exceptions and, a few months ago, the decision in Soulier, C-301/15 [here and - particularly - here], just to mention a couple of examples.Now comes a further CJEU ruling in which this trend is once again visible.Earlier this week, the Court issued its judgment in ITV Broadcasting v TVCatchup, C-275/15 (TV Catchup 2), a… [read post]
12 Jun 2023, 12:53 am by INFORRM
A costs hearing is set to take place on Tuesday On 9 June 2023, there was a hearing in the case of Styles v South Wales Police. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 6:03 am
 * A clear vision of genuine use: Specsavers v Asda (again) The Court of Appeal for England and Wales has just issued its decision in Specsavers v Asda, a very well-known saga the previous episodes of which have been severally covered by the IPKat [on initial skirmishes, here and here; on the High Court judgment of Mann J here; on the main decision and referral to Europe by the Court of Appeal here; on the costs ruling here and then the… [read post]
22 Jul 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
This is a welcome ruling in the face of efforts being made to prevent foreign claimants from bringing libel claims in the courts of England and Wales. [read post]
29 Aug 2013, 4:00 am by Blog  Editorial
   Michael v The Chief Constable of South Wales Police and another [2012] EWCA Civ 981 – granted on 26 June 2013 by Lord Hope, Lord Kerr and Lord Hughes. [read post]
15 Apr 2018, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The Protocol allows the highest national courts of Member States to pose questions to the Court on the interpretation and application of Convention rights in pending cases. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 5:50 am by Matthias Weller
Moreover, the Court considered that the subsidiary was a necessary and proper party to claim and that England and Wales was the proper place in which to bring the claims. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 2:36 pm by Giles Peaker
Dear Barnet, you are not in Wales.) [read post]