Search for: "State v. Wells" Results 621 - 640 of 74,762
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Oct 2015, 2:51 pm by Kent Scheidegger
"  On remand, the state court can say, "Well, then, it violates provision Z of the state constitution, even though the state and federal  provisions are worded the same. [read post]
17 Mar 2007, 1:10 am
Therefore, it is the well established law of this State that issues of credibility and the appropriate weight to give to a witness's testimony are for the jury, and it is impermissible, as a matter of law, for a witness to give an opinion on the credibility of another witness.At trial, petitioner was asked five "were-they-lying" questions. [read post]
12 Oct 2014, 1:00 pm by Lauren Bateman
The transcript of Judge Edgardo Ramos’ Wednesday hearing in Restis v. [read post]
27 Sep 2023, 7:19 am by Woodruff Family Law Group
In the Tar Heel State, the unique legal doctrines of Alienation of Affection and Criminal Conversation are still very much alive and well. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 5:00 am
This is the first in a series of posts on United States v. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 12:38 pm by Robert Chesney
  The 2009 indictment states that from September of 2007 through August of 2009, Omar, a Somali citizen who is a lawful permanent resident of the United States, conspired with others to provide financial assistance as well as personnel to al-Shabaab. [read post]