Search for: "Steve Vladeck"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,344
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2018, 7:47 pm
Anderson spoke with Jen Mascott of the Antonin Scalia School of Law at George Mason University, Steve Vladeck of the University of Texas at Austin School of Law, and former Department of Justice official Bob Loeb, currently a partner at the law firm of Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe. [read post]
24 Jul 2018, 12:11 pm
You can also find Bobby Chesney on the National Security Law Podcast (@NSLpodcast), which he co-hosts with Steve Vladeck (@steve_vladeck). [read post]
23 Jul 2018, 2:55 pm
All those podcasts with Steve Vladeck have left Bobby more comfortable blocking left hooks, but he and I still manage to engage profitably on the Carter Page FISA application document dump. [read post]
22 Jul 2018, 2:30 pm
[Bench Memos / National Review] * Speaking of which, Professor Steve Vladeck raises some good possible questions for the nominee about the interaction between Morrison v. [read post]
21 Jul 2018, 9:04 am
On the National Security Law Podcast, Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck debated whether Trump administration officials should resign after Helsinki. [read post]
20 Jul 2018, 8:51 am
Steve Vladeck discussed Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s views on Morrison v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 2:36 pm
“Kavanaugh, Mueller and Efforts to Have it Both Ways on Morrison”: Steve Vladeck has this post at the “Lawfare” blog. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 9:23 am
On the National Security Law Podcast, Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck debated whether Trump officials have an obligation to resign after Helsinki, the latest updates on Doe v. [read post]
14 Jul 2018, 11:47 am
And Peter Margulies responded to an op-ed by Steve Vladeck in the Washington Post, analyzing Kavanaugh’s military commissions rulings. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 12:15 pm
Judge Brett Kavanaugh’s judicial record on the Guantanamo military commissions is richer and less one-sided than some analysts, including Steve Vladeck in the Washington Post, have suggested. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 7:00 am
At the end of the last term, the Supreme Court decided in a 7-2 opinion that the high court exercises appellate jurisdiction over the United States’ military justice system—a system it says begins at the court-martial level, or trial level, through each Service’s Court of Criminal Appeals, up to the court of Appeals for the Armed Forces (CAAF), a tribunal with five president-appointed, Senate-confirmed civilian judges. [read post]
12 Jul 2018, 1:55 pm
ICYMI: Yesterday on Lawfare Bobby Chesney and Steve Vladeck posted this week’s edition of the National Security Law Podcast. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 4:22 am
At the American Constitution Society blog, professor Steve Vladeck sketches out one possible route for litigation: To be fair, the Special Counsel regulation has some of the hallmarks of legislative rules (which are harder to repeal). [read post]
3 Jul 2018, 5:32 am
United States, in which the justices held 7-2 that a judge’s simultaneous service on two military courts does not violate the dual-officeholder ban, Steve Vladeck, counsel for the petitioners, writes for the Harvard Law Review Blog that the case &ldq [read post]
30 Jun 2018, 4:08 am
On the National Security Law Podcast, Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck offered their take on the SCOTUS-filled week: Stephanie Leutert kicked off the immigration discussion this week with an explanation of who is crossing the border and their reasons for coming. [read post]
29 Jun 2018, 7:44 am
Robert Chesney and Steve Vladeck hosted a podcast on the consequences of Kennedy’s retirement, what the new Supreme Court nominee will look like, the Carpenter decision, and the Travel Ban decision. [read post]
26 Jun 2018, 5:58 pm
(Steve Vladeck had an excellent roundup, current before tonight.) [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:57 am
As Steve Vladeck noted on Twitter, the Supreme Court has made quite clear that this language means what it says, and applies to aliens on U.S. soil. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 4:18 am
At CNN, Ariane de Vogue reports that as the justices take the bench this morning for what is likely the last Monday of the term, “[s]ix opinions remain, including on the travel ban, public sector unions and redistricting, and one looming question that could change the future direction of the court: Will there be a retirement? [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 7:50 pm
” Law professor Steve Vladeck has this jurisprudence essay online at Slate. [read post]
