Search for: "Storm v. United States" Results 621 - 640 of 738
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Feb 2010, 7:24 pm by Dwight Sullivan
United States, No. 09-287, has been distributed for Friday’s conference. [read post]
9 Feb 2010, 1:39 pm by WIMS
      Following a five-day bench trial, the United States District Court for the District of Colorado denied Plaintiffs relief. [read post]
31 Jan 2010, 7:16 pm by admin
“The United States brought this case to protect an important body of water, Pyramid Lake,” said Ignacia S. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 4:56 pm by Eric Schweibenz
Motorola further alleges in the complaint that the RIM accused products are manufactured outside of the United States, for example, in Canada, Mexico, Japan, and China. [read post]
8 Jan 2010, 1:11 pm by WIMS
"According to the opinion, the United States, the Commonwealth, and Lexington ultimately reached a settlement agreement, embodied in a proposed consent decree, that would require Lexington to bring its sanitary and storm sewer systems into compliance with the Clean Water Act at an estimated cost, according to the United States, of $250 million to $300 million. [read post]
4 Jan 2010, 1:02 am by Paul D. Swanson
The majority further held that the Federal Circuit decisions were not binding on the Texas state court, reasoning that a Texas state court was only obligated to follow higher Texas courts and the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
3 Dec 2009, 6:21 am
Malcolm Stewart argued on behalf of the United States, as amicus curiae in support of Reynolds. [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 7:47 pm
The United States Supreme Court heard oral argument today in Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 6:01 am
United States; United States v. [read post]