Search for: "THE STATE v. ISLAM" Results 621 - 640 of 1,378
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Mar 2016, 2:54 pm
Section V then posits an alternative analysis, normatively autonomous (though not entirely free) of the orbit of the state, a vision possible only when the ideological presumptions of the state are suspended. [read post]
11 Apr 2014, 12:52 pm by Dave Maass
For the full amicus brief: https://www.eff.org/document/garcia-v-google-amicus For more on Garcia v. [read post]
29 Dec 2011, 1:50 am by Rosalind English
The Queen on the application of Naik v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 1546 – read judgment The Court of Appeal has confirmed that the exclusion of an Indian Muslim public speaker  from the United Kingdom after making statements which breached the Home Office’s “unacceptable behaviours policy” was lawful,  and that any interference with his rights was justified. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
Mahmood Nathie, The Constitution and Islam: Are Tax Reforms Possible to Facilitate Islamic Finance? [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 6:10 pm by Mary Dwyer
The petition of the day is: Islamic Republic of Iran v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 4:46 pm by Eugene Volokh
I’m inclined to think that the district court’s analysis was correct: Just as the law may not impose greater permit fees for controversial parades (see Forsyth County v. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 8:00 am by Ruth Levush
  However, the Law also states that, subject to the above stipulation of equality of spouses, “the parties to an Islamic marriage shall only have the rights granted under Islamic law. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:30 am
The court may also consider that both parties to the action are nonresidents and that the transaction out of which the cause of action arose occurred primarily in a foreign jurisdiction" (Islamic Republic of Iran v Pahlavi, 62 NY2d 474, 479 [1984, citations omitted], cert denied 469 US 1108 [1985]). [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 7:01 am by Joshua Matz
  The Hill discusses some of the amicus briefs filed recently in support of respondent Antoine Jones in United States v. [read post]