Search for: "Taking Offense v. California"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,358
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Feb 2021, 12:20 pm
" (Fontani v. [read post]
1 Oct 2009, 5:49 pm
From Arden v. [read post]
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
Fox v. [read post]
7 Feb 2010, 4:33 pm
It can be in the Ninth, thanks to a very disappointing decision in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 7:33 pm
"It shouldn't take a cum laude law degree to figure that out.Marc J. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:36 am
According to the complaint, she discovered in 2005 while attempting to fly from California to Malaysia that she was on a no-fly list. [read post]
5 Feb 2008, 8:11 am
Defendant's California conviction for grand theft from a person in violation of section 487(2) of the California Penal Code was a "violent felony" as defined in 18 U.S.C. section 924(e)(2)(B)(ii). [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 5:52 am
Kellman v. [read post]
4 May 2022, 6:43 am
Controllers that maintain such information must take reasonable measures to ensure that the data cannot be reidentified. [read post]
7 Jan 2024, 3:45 am
Here is the complaint: Babbitt v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 8:28 am
PB Farradyne, Inc. v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 6:41 am
Subsection (e)(11) defines ‘loss’ as `any reasonable cost to any victim, including the cost of responding to an offense, conducting a damage assessment, and restoring the data, program, system, or information to its condition prior to the offense, and any revenue lost, cost incurred, or other consequential damages incurred because of interruption of service[.] [read post]
18 Jun 2010, 1:10 pm
Dillon v. [read post]
14 May 2018, 8:58 am
It's the third trial in the first Apple v. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 5:01 am
From People v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 8:47 am
De Havilland v. [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 12:58 pm
Give the government an inch, it takes a mile. [read post]
3 Nov 2021, 12:10 pm
California was unreasonable under 28 U.S.C. [read post]
7 May 2014, 4:37 pm
Morel Ripoff Report and Topix Postings Protected by California’s Anti-SLAPP Law–Chaker v. [read post]
21 Jul 2008, 9:14 pm
Chacon, No. 07-4439 A sex offense perpetrated in the absence of consent, and which does not have as an element the use, attempted use, or threatened use of physical force, is nevertheless a "forcible sex offense" encompassed within the Sentencing Guidelines definition of a "crime of violence. [read post]
