Search for: "Taylor v. United States"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,443
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Apr 2010, 11:25 am
Louis Dispatch, and the Columbia (MO) Daily Tribune all report on a case that has been dropped as a result of last week’s ruling in United States v. [read post]
12 Mar 2015, 7:40 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 6:48 pm
It was in that context that Carswell, J., stated: Therefore, section 211 of the Surrogate's Court Act is not applicable to or binding upon the United States. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 1:17 pm
("United"), the company for whom Adem drove the cab. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 7:54 am
” You can read the case, United Stationers v. [read post]
27 Feb 2020, 7:54 am
” You can read the case, United Stationers v. [read post]
13 Dec 2010, 5:27 pm
The court in Taylor v. [read post]
2 May 2008, 7:21 pm
United States and Shepard v. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 3:00 am
The teachers appealed to the Appellate Division.In a 4 to 1 ruling, the Appellate Division, Third Department, agreed with the lower court.The court applied a two-part test set out in Liverpool CSD v United Liverpool Faculty Asso., 42 NY2d 509. [read post]
19 Nov 2019, 3:43 pm
See, e.g., Taylor v. [read post]
21 May 2013, 12:33 pm
Kappos v. [read post]
12 Nov 2015, 1:24 pm
Taylor, Tom C. [read post]
10 Nov 2010, 3:38 am
No “anti-arbitrating” presumption to resolving grievances alleging a violation of a collective bargaining agreementWatertown CSD v Watertown Education AssociationIndian River CSD v Indian River Education AssociationCourt of Appeals, Nos. 50 & 51, joint decision issued 93 NY2d 132In numerous decisions, New York State courts have frowned on the use of arbitration to settle disputes between public employers and unions unless the collective bargaining agreement… [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 7:19 am
More evidence that courts are tightening up on multi-state FLSA collective actions comes from Vasquez v. [read post]
4 Apr 2019, 6:23 am
Taylor v. [read post]
10 Jun 2007, 9:29 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 1:59 pm
As a consequence, the results do support the idea that the time has come for Congress to at least consider overturning the Supreme Court’s new eligibility standard to prevent additional lost investment in technological development in the United States. [read post]
10 Nov 2007, 5:29 am
Compare United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2016, 7:47 am
From the article:As any geography nerd knows, the precise center of the United States is in northern Kansas, near the Nebraska border. [read post]
21 Apr 2010, 4:32 am
United States, 893 P.2d 345 (Nev. 1995); Smith v. [read post]