Search for: "The Confederate Note Case"
Results 621 - 640
of 797
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Sep 2012, 7:13 am
If it is viewed as a conflicts rule, its content would fall to be determined on a case-by-case basis by the courts in decisions in which they would attempt to implement the objectives of order and fairness in the legal system. [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 8:20 am
Beginning with the famous case of Bolling v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 2:08 pm
(Some years ago I had some preliminary thoughts on how to draw inferences about judicial philosophy based on cases decided more or less simultaneously in the Confederate state supreme courts.) [read post]
14 Aug 2012, 3:45 am
The opinion notes that “this case is not the first case where the State mischaracterized the evidence and testimony and then used that mischaracterization in trial and appeal,” and cautions that “this court not condone this tactic and its continued use is abhorrent to the judicial system itself and the public’s confidence in the judicial system. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 6:41 am
You can contact Attorney Johnson anytime day or night and talk with him directly about your case. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:06 am
NOTE: Status of DTAAs/TIEAs negotiations as on 1st August 2012 is given at the end as Annexure-I. [read post]
10 Aug 2012, 8:06 am
NOTE: Status of DTAAs/TIEAs negotiations as on 1st August 2012 is given at the end as Annexure-I. [read post]
6 Aug 2012, 5:00 am
His well-established record was that of a chief executive very willing to second-guess military courts—scholars note that he disapproved or granted substantial clemency on a full third of the cases that came to him for final action. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 2:35 am
Note that this is just the Executive Summary. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 9:01 pm
Though I might note that some twitter uses (or at least one twitter user) are (is) coming to the defense of JoePa. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 8:58 am
To be sure, this framework created by Sosa has been, as I noted above, under-appreciated – by which I mean more or less ignored. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 5:00 am
Here is a note to any library directors reading this post, legacy memory is important. [read post]
8 Jul 2012, 7:35 am
" The authors note this as an example of original intentions, and they also emphasize that the three opinions in the case all focused to varying degrees on framers' intentions. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:41 pm
The following contribution to our post-decision symposium on the health care cases is written by Elizabeth B. [read post]
29 Jun 2012, 12:41 pm
The following contribution to our post-decision symposium on the health care cases is written by Elizabeth B. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 10:01 pm
As the Texas Court of Appeals noted in 1997 (see below), Hardin frequently stated that “he had never killed anyone who didn’t deserve to be killed. [read post]
21 Jun 2012, 3:55 pm
” The court also noted that a jury question exists concerning the severity and pervasiveness of the banana incidents. [read post]
20 Jun 2012, 5:00 am
Note the word "image. [read post]
19 Jun 2012, 8:55 am
Case C-137/12 European Commission v Council of the European Union is a battle of the Euro-titans, with the European Commission picking on the Council on a matter of policy as well as principle. [read post]
14 Jun 2012, 5:55 am
Note that the Bell Letter was relied on substantially by the Executive Branch in the Jicarilla case before the Supreme Court to support its assertion that the US does not act as a trustee or consider Indian tribes to be its clients regarding trust asset management. [read post]
