Search for: "The PEOPLE v. French"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,339
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 May 2012, 6:43 am
Vraiment Hospitality, LLC v. [read post]
25 May 2021, 7:20 am
Section V – Copyright enforcement: the technological and cross-border dimensions Section five covers copyright enforcement, in four detailed chapters. [read post]
3 Mar 2013, 8:42 pm
Moving on further, Aparajita highlighted the Bombay High court’s recent decision on Trademark infringement of SABMiller India Ltd. v/s Som. [read post]
14 Aug 2015, 2:35 am
The case of Target Australia Pty Ltd v Catchoftheday.com.au Pty Ltd [2015] ATMO 54, decided in June, aimed to answer this question in the fair land of Australia. [read post]
14 Oct 2007, 7:30 am
The economics of attention: AFP v. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 7:40 pm
” Authors’ Guild v. [read post]
16 Feb 2018, 11:00 am
Canadian case: Cinar Corp. v. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Aren’t there a bunch of plaintiffs out there suing Eli Lilly because its anti-schizophrenia drug, Zyprexa supposedly causes diabetes – at least in obese people who would probably contract the disease anyway? [read post]
26 Apr 2009, 9:00 pm
Perhaps Boucher was happy to be dealing with investigators who speak his native French, if in fact French was being spoken. [read post]
20 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
My hypothesis for now is that in the early years of CanLII, the coverage was just too thin to generate more than small-but-steady growth in impact, but that by 2011, the collection covered a big enough range of years to be relied upon by more people, and in turn to have more impact on the form of legal decisions. [read post]
28 Dec 2019, 8:33 am
In some sense, this was also the great year of Jew baiting--everyone, it seems, had something to say about the People of Israel, even as their actions usually belied their words. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 4:00 am
So many people have been emailing the IPKat to ask him if he has seen yesterday's General Court decision in Case T-332/10 Viaguara v OHIM - Pfizer (VIAGUARA) that he's beginning to worry if they are trying to tell him something. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 6:30 am
In Van Orden v. [read post]
10 Sep 2023, 12:08 am
Most French people seem to support the ban. [read post]
22 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
Example: LV v. [read post]
22 May 2016, 4:05 pm
Davies doorstepped convicted fraudster Neelam Desai once and sent her two emails over claims she had conned people out of thousands of pounds. [read post]
30 Jan 2010, 5:56 pm
Stewart v. [read post]
1 Nov 2018, 10:28 am
It’s not hard to see where the justices are leaning in Frank v. [read post]
16 Mar 2025, 1:21 am
Chen Fanglin, Fujian High People’s court held that such a clause does not violate CPL and recognized its validity. [14] Second, party autonomy in civil and commercial litigations should be protected.[15] In Sun Jichuan v. [read post]
31 Jan 2021, 4:13 pm
Mr Aston described the claimant as a “feminist cretin” and said that she “set fire to people’s money”. [read post]
