Search for: "The United States District Court for the Central District of California" Results 621 - 640 of 2,181
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Jun 2011, 9:46 pm by Tomassi Law Associates
This case is about equality, regardless of gender or sexual orientation, wrote Judge Thomas Donovan of the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
21 Jun 2018, 9:02 pm by James Aspell
District Courts in both states as well, in addition to being a licensed realtor in the state of Connecticut. [read post]
29 Aug 2011, 10:16 am by CJLF Staff
  Convicted drug dealer Arjang Panah was transferred to a federal prison in California's Central Valley in 2005, where he contracted coccidioidomycosis ("valley fever"), a disease caused by a fungus found in soil in southwestern United States. [read post]
8 May 2013, 8:32 am by Jon Sands
Clarifying the holding in United States v. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Commissioner White is admitted to practice law before the courts of New York, New Jersey, the District of Columbia, the United States District Courts of the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
20 Nov 2017, 9:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Commissioner White is admitted to practice law before the courts of New York, New Jersey, the District of Columbia, the United States District Courts of the Southern and Eastern Districts of New York, the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey and before the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 7:31 am by John Bellinger
  In a short but carefully-structured opinion issued March 2, Judge Stephen Wilson of the Central District of California held that the plaintiffs’ claims do not “touch and concern” the United States with sufficient force to rebut the presumption against extraterritorial application of the ATS set forth in the Supreme Court’s decision in Kiobel. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:49 am by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of the Interior (Gaming; Land into Trust)Ak-Chin Indian Community v. [read post]
17 Jan 2018, 10:49 am by Native American Rights Fund
United States Department of the Interior (Gaming; Land into Trust)Ak-Chin Indian Community v. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am by Benson Varghese
The Supreme Court bump stock decision, coming in at a 6-3 ruling, marked a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over firearm regulations in the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am by Benson Varghese
The Supreme Court bump stock decision, coming in at a 6-3 ruling, marked a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over firearm regulations in the United States. [read post]
15 Jun 2024, 8:02 am by Benson Varghese
The Supreme Court bump stock decision, coming in at a 6-3 ruling, marked a pivotal moment in the ongoing debate over firearm regulations in the United States. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 7:03 pm by FDABlog HPM
District Court for the Central District of California recently decided that claims against a manufacturer of a homeopathic drug are not preempted by the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (“FDC Act”). [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:57 pm by Trey Childress
Applied then filed a complaint for declaratory relief against Surgical in the United States District Court for the Central District of California. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 10:16 am by Kurt T. Koehler
(1envelope) Dec 23 2011 The record from U.S.D.C. for District Court for the Central District of California is electronic. [read post]
29 Oct 2009, 2:52 pm
For example, the Central District of California seems to routinely order restitution of $5000 while the Eastern District of California routinely orders restitution of $3000. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 8:45 am by Allison Tussey
This investigation was conducted by IRS Criminal Investigation and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, in conjunction with the United States Attorney’s Offices for the Central District of California and Western District of Washington. [read post]
3 Sep 2014, 9:51 am by Abbott & Kindermann
The Third District Court of Appeal recently wrestled with CEQA’s equivalent to defining the undefinable, concluding that the level of detail on a programmatic EIR was sufficient.The most recent treatment of the topic involves the various challenges to the decision of the California High-Speed Rail Authority in certifying a program EIR for a preferred route corridor from the Bay Area into the Central Valley. [read post]