Search for: "Time, Inc. v. TIME INC." Results 621 - 640 of 40,287
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Oct 2010, 6:59 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
--Court: United States District Court for the District of MaineOpinion Date: 9/29/10Cite: OfficeMax Inc. v. [read post]
2 Nov 2012, 12:23 pm by EPSTEIN BECKER & GREEN, P.C.
In Alonzo, a federal district court granted summary judgment in favor of our client MAXIMUS, Inc. on the plaintiffs’ time rounding claims. [read post]
  The district court rejected the notion that such time is compensable under California law and, earlier this month, the Ninth Circuit agreed in Cazares v. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 4:30 am by Chip Merlin
We cited two cases where adjustment time was considered in the period of restoration: In United Land Investors, Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jul 2017, 7:14 am
  In the court’s view, Developer had not alleged sufficient facts to show that the boards contained a disinterested majority during the time period at issue.Lastly, Developer argued that Owners’ claims failed to meet FRCP Rule 9(b)’s particularity requirements that time, place, and contents of allegedly fraudulent statements and the person making such statements be pled with sufficiency. [read post]
4 Jun 2024, 4:49 pm by INFORRM
On 22 February 2024, Master Dagnall handed down judgment in Hawrami v Journalism Development Network Inc [2024] EWHC 389 (KB) in relation to an article (“the Article”) first published on 22 May 2021 by Journalism Development Network Inc and written by Mr Daniel Balint-Kurti and Mr William Jordan (“the Defendants”). [read post]
7 Mar 2016, 11:14 am by Stacey Lantagne
In this instance, a case out of Washington called Marcus & Millichap Real Estate Investment Services of Seattle, Inc. v. [read post]
18 May 2015, 10:00 pm by Courtenay C. Brinckerhoff
The Federal Circuit issued its remand decision in Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. [read post]