Search for: "Ton v. State" Results 621 - 640 of 1,048
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jun 2012, 6:15 am
The law required a ships over 400 tons to have a functional oily water separator to filter bilge water before discharging it. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 8:29 am by McNabb Associates, P.C.
Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) on June 6, 2012 released the following: “–Multi-Ton Quantities of Cocaine Shipped Aboard American Airlines Commercial Aircraft Destined for Continental United States– June 6 (San Juan, PR) – On May 31, a federal grand jury indicted 25 individuals as a result of an investigation lead by the Drug Enforcement Administration, the Puerto Rico Police Department (PRPD), and the Puerto Rico Department of Justice, announced today… [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 6:00 am by Jeff Lorenzo
On May 25, 2012, the Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals issued a decision in Sierra Club, et al. v. [read post]
30 May 2012, 7:03 am by Howard Zimmerle
I’ve read a ton of transcripts that go like this: Q: So doctor, you agree that Mr. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 7:00 am
 At the close of the nine day bench trial, Judge Guilford stated that he had concluded there were "dramatic acts of misappropriation" and his opinion emphasized that his findings of fact were "largely based" on the credibility of the witnesses. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 9:56 am
The next time that someone tells you that appellate jurisprudence has changed a lot during the past half-century, here's Exhibit A of your rebuttal.Due process and state action requirements have changed a ton since the Warren Court. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 2:17 am by Alfred Brophy
United States in property class -- I gather that it's only in the Dukeminier property book. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 11:54 am by Rebecca Tushnet
To what extent is this value created by the public v. the person. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 6:01 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  (I’m not sure this is true, as a property teacher who recently taught State v. [read post]
10 Apr 2012, 1:26 am
The Claimant objected, and stated that any substitution would be subject to approval by the Recipient. [read post]