Search for: "Toy v. Toy" Results 621 - 640 of 1,669
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2015, 11:06 am
Supreme Court, in revisiting the issue in the case of Kimble v Marvel Entertainment, LLC (as reported by AmeriKat on June 30th), would provide some clarity. [read post]
17 Jan 2008, 12:01 pm
Check out this statement from an article that I read today:    Now, as if you needed more proof that we live in a time in which stuffy lawyers don't dig the digital age, take a look at this: It looks like toy-makers Hasbro and Mattel have sent their legal goons to Facebook and demanded that it remove the immensely popular 'Scrabulous' from its site. [read post]
6 Jan 2020, 4:02 am
January 28, 2020 - 2 PM: Progressive Beverages, Inc. v. [read post]
23 May 2020, 12:03 am by Magdaleen Jooste
In the case of Agarwal v. [read post]
4 Nov 2022, 3:26 am
November 10, 022 - 1 PM: Stuart Weitzman IP, LLC v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 7:56 am
It's Case C-190/10 GÉNESIS SEGUROS GENERALES SOCIEDAD ANÓNIMA DE SEGUROS Y REASEGUROS v BOYS TOYS S.A. and ADMINISTRACIÓN DEL ESTADO (Merpel hopes there's nothing significant about the fact that the parties' names are in capital letters -- it looks like shouting). [read post]
28 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
This doctrine is explained in Playboy Enterprises, Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 5:09 pm
For $10 the child can have his or her picture made with Santa and their toy. [read post]