Search for: "Trademark Cases" Results 621 - 640 of 23,962
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
This is a useful transfer of image case, demonstrating the reach of luxury brands who can support their reputation through persuasive evidence from an early stage. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 2:45 pm by Megan Bannigan
Elster, the latest in a line of recent cases probing the intersection of the First Amendment and trademark law, following 2017’s Matal v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 2:45 pm by Megan Bannigan
Elster, the latest in a line of recent cases probing the intersection of the First Amendment and trademark law, following 2017’s Matal v. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 2:42 pm by Howard Bashman
“Supreme Court Wary of Trademark for ‘Trump Too Small’; In earlier cases, the justices struck down provisions of the trademark law on First Amendment grounds; But the one at issue here seemed likely to survive”: Adam Liptak of The New York Times has this report. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 8:53 am by Ashley E. Holland
What the Court decides is important in trademark cases regarding political commentary of government or public figures. [read post]
1 Nov 2023, 7:05 am by Associated Press
” The post Supreme Court confronts question of trademark rights in ‘Trump too small’ case appeared first on Maryland Daily Record. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 12:56 pm by Howard Bashman
“Justices Will Probe Trademarks’ Nature in ‘Trump Too Small’ Case; Trademark office blocked ‘Trump Too Small’ in 2019; Appeals court overruled ban in 2022”: Kyle Jahner of Bloomberg Law has this report. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 4:07 am
The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board (Tee-Tee-Ā-Bee) has scheduled six oral hearings for the month of November 2023. [read post]
31 Oct 2023, 1:00 am by admin
Trademarks Trademarks protect symbols, names, and slogans used to identify goods or services. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:26 pm by Greg Lambert
For judges, AI could help manage pro se cases and expedite decision-making. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 11:26 am by centerforartlaw
Attorneys being paid in artwork is relatively uncommon, but it does happen in certain cases, particularly within the art world or when clients have valuable art assets. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 10:30 am by Alec Pronk
This week in Washington IP news, a Senate Subcommittee holds a hearing on AI’s impact on the U.S. workforce and the "TRUMP TOO SMALL" trademark case heads to argument at the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 10:30 am by Alec Pronk
This week in Washington IP news, a Senate Subcommittee holds a hearing on AI’s impact on the U.S. workforce and the "TRUMP TOO SMALL" trademark case heads to argument at the Supreme Court. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 7:50 am by Latosha M. Ellis and Jae Lynn Huckaba
Another advantage to sneaker insurance is that the sneakers are valued and authenticated during the underwriting process and insured at replacement cost, rather than actual cash value, allowing the collector, in most cases, to avoid incurring a loss because of depreciation or a decline in market value for the sneaker. [read post]
30 Oct 2023, 3:58 am by Dan Harris
As a result, “trademark squatting,” where local entities register foreign trademarks before the original owners can, is a common issue. [read post]
28 Oct 2023, 9:35 am by Mavrick Law Firm
However, determining which costs are deductible from revenue can be tricky and vary case by case. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 3:17 pm by Kalvis Golde
The justices ruled that a satirical dog toy in the style of the famous whiskey bottle was not protected by the First Amendment, and they sent the case back to the lower courts for them to determine whether the toy infringes on the company’s trademark. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 10:50 am by Howard Bashman
“Seven Cases, Seven Different Attorneys for US at Supreme Court; Solicitor General’s Office spreads work around for next sitting; Major disputes before justices over guns, trademarks”: Lydia Wheeler of Bloomberg Law has this report. [read post]
27 Oct 2023, 7:40 am by Ronald Mann
But we know from Tam and Iancu that the court finds these trademark registration limitations dubious, even when the speech is relatively distasteful (as it was in both of the earlier cases). [read post]