Search for: "U. S. v. Block" Results 621 - 640 of 654
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Jan 2009, 2:02 pm
That's the date the Hawaii Federalist Society is sponsoring a debate on the ceded lands case, Hawaii v. [read post]
15 Dec 2008, 12:00 pm
Tzolis v Wolff, 10 NY3d 100 [2008]), appellant is barred by § 610 from intervening in an effort to block enforcement of the company's obligation to repay the loan to the lender. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:00 pm
    N E A R B Y  H O T E L  O P T I O N S   Hyatt Regency Hotel 151 East Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 312-565-1234 *3 blocks from Sheraton   Ritz Carlton Chicago 160 East Pearson Street Chicago, IL 312-266-1000 *12 blocks from Sheraton   Doubletree Hotel 300 East Ohio Street Chicago, IL 312-787-6100 *4 blocks from Sheraton   Embassy Suites 511 N Columbus Drive … [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 1:25 pm
Here is IP Think Tank’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:15 am
Will Step Up's "trade name" use provide it with a solid basis for blocking registration by Petitioner? [read post]
2 May 2008, 9:03 am
"Berry's attorneys have asked the Mississippi Supreme Court to block the execution, saying the state's method is different. [read post]
21 Apr 2008, 9:32 am
It's also not the law, and it's been rejected in several 230 cases (Noah v. [read post]
15 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
  Shame about the IP: (Afro-IP),Ethiopia receives US trade mark for Sidamo coffee despite opposition from Starbucks: (The IP Factor), (Afro-IP),CC licensed test for African sleeping sickness: (creativecommons.org),Update on PCT applications filed in Nigeria: (Afro-IP),Parallel imports of DVDs to be tested in South Africa: Universal City Studios v Mr Video: (Afro-IP),The W****D C*P of 2*1*: FIFA’s intellectual property rights in South Africa: (Afro-IP),Namibia to… [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 7:58 am
  As a matter of constitutional interpretation, Hoke v U.S., 227 U.S. 308 (1913) seemed to suggest that Congress had the power to block movement of people across state lines for any purpose whatsoever. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 10:00 am
When a Member State's law grants a monopoly of exploitation to the owner of such a right, it follows that the owner may forbid any unauthorized third party, or infringer, from any sale, use or other exploitation within that State.[40] If an industrial or commercial property right has considerable economic significance, the owner in one State usually seeks to obtain parallel protection in all of the other States of the Community; however, this is not always possible, either because… [read post]