Search for: "UBER, INC" Results 621 - 640 of 790
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 May 2023, 8:47 pm by Anthony Zaller
Uber Technologies, Inc., and will decide the following issue: Whether an aggrieved employee who has been compelled to arbitrate claims under the Private Attorneys General Act (PAGA) that are “premised on Labor Code violations actually sustained by” the aggrieved employee (Viking River Cruises, Inc. v. [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 4:30 am by Barry Sookman
http://t.co/8cnk7BoXnw -> B2B Sales And Marketing Inhibitors http://t.co/Y2e5JLVcKJ -> CASL "this law is ridiculous as it punishes legitimate marketers from reaching out to companies" http://t.co/ukJTn91piv -> Safari workaround claimants to get their day in UK court against Google: Google Inc v Vidal-Hall http://t.co/IQVjbtAB7S -> blogged: Computer and Internet Law Updates for 2015-03-29 http://t.co/O1w0YtVayL -> blogged: Safari workaround claimants to get… [read post]
7 Apr 2020, 7:45 am by Wiggam & Geer
Here’s some helpful information from our friends at Bach, James, Mansour & Company, Inc. [read post]
6 Feb 2020, 9:36 am by James W. Ward
‘Gig’ Companies Finally, Uber and Postmates filed their suit on December 30, 2019, and are also seeking a preliminary injunction prohibiting AB 5 enforcement. [read post]
18 Sep 2019, 8:23 am by Nassiri Law
Within the so-called “gig economy,” for example, rideshare companies like Uber and Lyft continue to insist they are not included in the new legislation. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
  The following Supreme Court judgments remain outstanding: The Law Debenture Trust Corporation plc v Ukraine (Represented by the Minister of Finance of Ukraine acting upon the instructions of the Cabinet of Ministers of Ukraine) Nos. 2 and 3, heard 9-12 December 2019 Royal Mencap Society v Tomlinson-Blake, heard 12- 13 February 2020 Shannon v Rampersad & Anor (T/A Clifton House Residential Home), heard 12-13 February 2020 Asda Stores Ltd v Brierly & Ors, heard 13-14 June 2020… [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 1:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 13 October, the Supreme Court will hear the appeal of  R (on the application of KBR, Inc) v Director of the Serious Fraud Office. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 2:57 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
”  This determination was affirmed and expanded on by the Supreme Court of Canada again in the 2020 decision of Uber Technologies Inc. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by Barry Sookman
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., https://t.co/sqpbd508hg -> Click wrap agreement enforced MOULE v. [read post]
Uber Technologies, the California Supreme Court recognized that the proper course for a trial court to take after compelling an employee’s individual PAGA claim to arbitration is to stay the non-individual PAGA claim. [read post]