Search for: "UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. English"
Results 621 - 640
of 656
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jul 2008, 5:31 pm
The PSC argues that the cost of translation should be considered reasonable cost of doing business in the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2008, 11:05 am
interview: (IP tango) Events 7 July: PLI briefing webcast ‘Life after Quanta v LGE: What every patent lawyer needs to know’: (PLI), 7-15 July/16-18 July: 2nd Transatlantic IP summer academy, modules one and two – Alicante/Milan: (IPKat), 9 July 2008: ALI & ABA webcast ‘Quanta v LG: What you should know’: (Patent Docs), 11 July: CIPA moot to improve participants’ understanding of procedures of EPO Technical… [read post]
14 Mar 2008, 2:33 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America House of Lords “A person could not be extradited to the United States of America to stand trial on charges brought under US legislation which declared cartels to be illegal, to stand trial for price-fixing offences alleged to have been committed from 1989 to 2000 because during that period price-fixing agreements and cartels were not illegal under English law, unless… [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 2:06 am
Norris v Government of the United States of America [2008] UKHL 16; WLR (D) 81 “During the period from 1989 to 2000 price fixing was not illegal under English law so that it was not an extradition offence for the purposes of s 137 of the Extradition Act 2003. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 11:58 am
The agreements are said to have been made outside the United States, in Europe, Mexico and Canada, but to have been given effect in the United States. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 10:56 am
Skrobot along with eighteen others on February 5, 2008 at the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois located in Chicago.[4] Mr. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 6:44 am
Skrobot along with eighteen others on February 5, 2008 at the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois located in Chicago.[4] Mr. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 1:10 pm
Therefore, in interpreting and applying this Code section, the courts of this state may draw from the opinions ofthe United States Supreme Court in Daubert v. [read post]
4 Mar 2008, 12:14 pm
The United States thus became a model of justice for the world. [read post]
22 Feb 2008, 6:00 pm
Signature Financial Group, Inc., and AT&T Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2008, 1:00 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Thinktank Global week in Review at [feeds.feedburner.com]Highlights this week included:Chinese company Zhongyi Electronic sues Microsoft for alleged patent infringement relating to technology that converts Roman characters to Chinese characters: (Jurist), (China Hearsay), (IP Dragon),US Patent reform and surrounding controversy: general commentary and opinions: (Patent Baristas), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (IPBiz), (Patent … [read post]
11 Jan 2008, 9:00 am
: (IP Spotlight)PharmaIndia: Trade mark assignment under scrutiny in a case of deceptive similarity - Doctor Morepen Limited v Yash Pharma Laboratories Limited: (Mondaq),Arrow v Merck - An early route to market for generics? [read post]
6 Jan 2008, 9:31 pm
§ 4106A(b)(1)(A) and the Treaty Between the United States of America and the United Mexican States on the Execution of Penal Sentences, U.S. [read post]
28 Dec 2007, 1:00 am
: (IPBiz),Sinorgchem v. [read post]
23 Dec 2007, 9:55 am
This list was put together by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
20 Dec 2007, 7:47 am
Title V/CSHCN has supported care notebooks for families and hired parent advocates around the state. [read post]
11 Dec 2007, 10:24 pm
Supreme Court case of New York Times v. [read post]
21 Nov 2007, 5:15 am
[21] The Authors Guild "represents more than 8,000 authors and is the largest society of published writers in the United States. [read post]
18 Nov 2007, 9:08 pm
Cal. 2005); Viacom International v. [read post]
13 Nov 2007, 7:03 am
The Pennsylvania cerebral palsy resource guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy. [read post]
