Search for: "UNITED STATES v. MERCHANT"
Results 621 - 640
of 730
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Sep 2010, 10:45 pm
Inc. v. [read post]
26 Aug 2010, 3:45 am
Premo v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 11:36 am
Foreign financial institutions seeking to offer them to retail customers within the United States will now have to offer such contracts through one of the other legal mechanisms available under the CEA for accessing U.S. retail customers. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
For purposes of the Graves Amendment, section 30102(a)(6) of Chapter 301 of Title 49 of the United States Code, entitled Motor Vehicle Safety, defines "motor vehicle" as "a vehicle driven or drawn by mechanical power and manufactured primarily for use on public streets, roads, and highways, but does not include a vehicle operated only on a rail line. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:18 pm
She begins with an historical defense: From the birth of the United States as a nation, foreign and international law influenced legal reasoning and judicial decisionmaking. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:55 am
An opinion piece for the New York Times defends the Court’s decision in the animal cruelty case, United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 12:05 pm
In addition, the decision in Cuomo v. [read post]
23 Jul 2010, 10:06 am
It is probably the broadest injunction in the entire body of United States law, because it is designed to stop the "race of diligence" among creditors, and to protect the debtor and the bankruptcy estate, in Arizona and the rest of the country. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 3:37 pm
The $4 million civil penalty will be divided among the United States, Alabama and Iowa. [read post]
19 Jul 2010, 6:51 am
United States/Gould v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 5:53 am
United States; Gould v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 2:08 am
The Respondent’s base of operations is the United States. [read post]
5 Jul 2010, 4:22 am
McGraw v. [read post]
4 Jul 2010, 6:02 pm
(Public Knowledge) Michael Geist presentation: ACTA – The state of play (Michael Geist) Australia I thought cats were colour blind… Federal Court confirms Mars has exclusive right to use colour ‘Whiskas purple’ for cat food: Mars Australia Pty Ltd (formerly Effem Foods Pty Ltd) v Société des Produits Nestlé SA (Australian Trade Marks Law Blog) FCAFC: On appeal, simulated flames from direct light found infringing: Bitech… [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 3:19 am
Garamendi, which dismissed plaintiff’s state law claims for failure to pay benefits on the ground that they were preempted by the “foreign policy” of the United States and that Holocaust-era insurance claims should be resolved instead through the ICHEIC. [read post]
26 May 2010, 6:46 am
” The New York Law Journal analyzes the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
18 May 2010, 5:44 pm
Three weeks ago, Stanley Fish's essay "The First Amendment and Kittens" reflected on the Supreme Court's recent decision in United States v. [read post]
11 May 2010, 1:50 pm
Furthermore, state laws may require different or additional provisions to ensure the desired result. [read post]
10 May 2010, 9:58 pm
And just a few weeks ago, in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 10:16 am
by Sara Davidson The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit issued an opinion on April 1, 2010 that provides a compass for companies like eBay to navigate the murky waters of trademark infringement in the e-commerce marketplace. [read post]
