Search for: "US v. Coats"
Results 621 - 640
of 1,079
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Jul 2013, 10:27 am
Contrast, unfortunately, the Medicaid expansion: Congress did not anticipate the Court’s Spending Clause holding in NFIB v. [read post]
10 Jul 2013, 8:58 am
“Let us assume that a first priority document discloses a method of coating the inner wall of a pipe and that a second priority document discloses the use of the same method for coating the inner wall of bottles or any other hollow bodies. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 8:35 am
In Conor v Angiotech [2008] UKHL 49 [noted by the IPKat here] the question was whether it was obvious to use a taxol-coated stent for preventing restenosis. [read post]
3 Jul 2013, 1:46 pm
Coat hangers.I know. [read post]
1 Jul 2013, 2:30 am
July 24, 2013 - 2 PM: Frito-Lay North America, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:10 pm
Quinn Heraty reports on the trademark battle to make us forget SPAM v. [read post]
10 Jun 2013, 6:28 am
Kelly-Brown v. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 3:00 am
R. from Alberta and R. v. 78 M. [read post]
29 May 2013, 7:00 am
These regulatory structures impact poor communities of color in vastly disproportionate numbers and are often justified through the use of racialized tropes. [read post]
27 May 2013, 5:42 am
AFL Telecommunications LLC v. [read post]
4 May 2013, 1:00 am
Federal Trade Commission (FTC) offer US v. [read post]
1 May 2013, 1:36 pm
District Court for the Southern District of New York (full decision here) in Louis Vuitton Malletier v. [read post]
30 Apr 2013, 3:34 pm
On April 30, 2013, the Court of Appeals granted leave in Hoover v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:06 am
Richards v. [read post]
23 Apr 2013, 6:00 am
Lateef v. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 7:28 am
There was a possibility that this use would insidiously erode the reputation of BSkyB's mark over time and that Walsh was unfairly coat-tailing. * Would Walsh's use of his mark have constituted passing off On balance, while there was an attempt to take unfair advantage, this did not extend to an attempt by Walsh to pass his off services off as being those of BSkyB. [read post]
22 Apr 2013, 7:11 am
Elcometer, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2013, 8:58 pm
I am thinking about test cases because of Deckers Corp. v. [read post]
13 Apr 2013, 7:54 am
Surface water use requires a permit from the TCEQ. [read post]
11 Apr 2013, 8:00 am
In Promatek v. [read post]
