Search for: "US v. Cox"
Results 621 - 640
of 908
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Jan 2014, 1:59 pm
Umbro: “a domain name registrant acquires the contractual right to use a unique domain name for a specified period of time . . . [read post]
25 Jul 2010, 8:26 pm
Tiequon Aundray Cox v. [read post]
7 May 2008, 3:33 pm
" United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 11:49 am
" NFP criminal opinions today (8): Patrick Cox v. [read post]
11 Dec 2023, 9:05 pm
Kahn v. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 9:10 am
A similar case, against Cox Communications, saw the jury award the record labels 1 billion dollars. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 7:07 am
Armed with those legal victories, Goldman is now targeting new sites and companies, most notably Cox Media Group. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 11:35 am
Cox, Castle & Nicholson Partner Andrew Sabey argued before the Court on behalf of the California Building and Industry Association. [read post]
15 May 2008, 10:20 pm
Stretching Sarbanes-Oxley Beyond Corporate Fraud Keith Bishop notes: The 11th Circuit recently rendered an interesting decision in US v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 10:17 am
Cox, 10-CR-85-WMC, U.S. [read post]
20 Jul 2008, 11:39 pm
Macomber v. [read post]
29 Nov 2010, 8:29 am
Dean v. [read post]
14 Jul 2010, 8:01 am
About 6 degrees off-beam should be okay (see Catnic Components Ltd v Hill & Smith, here). [read post]
27 Mar 2023, 1:25 am
The app is facing a complete ban in the US due to fears that it is used as a tool by the Chinese authorities to spy and spread propaganda. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:01 pm
Health Secretary Matt Hancock said afterward that “we will look back on this day, V-Day, as a key moment in the fighback of this terrible disease. [read post]
17 May 2022, 10:57 am
In Packingham v. [read post]
10 Apr 2019, 4:52 pm
The Supreme Court rejected Sharp LJ’s findings that Mitting J had merely used a dictionary as check. [read post]
2 Dec 2008, 3:57 pm
In the case of Cox and Riley (1983) 83 Cr App R 54 the court found that according to the dictionary damage meant "injury impairing value or usefulness" hence damaging computer programs by hacking was brought under the Criminal Damage Act (see also The Mad Hacker: The Mad Hacker (Times 25th May 1990) ). [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 8:28 am
United States, consolidated with Cox v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 12:59 am
The case, The Gambia v. [read post]
