Search for: "US v. Mark Stephens" Results 621 - 640 of 1,164
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2014, 3:23 am by Amy Howe
Justice Stephen Breyer, whom many think of as part of the Court’s more liberal wing, provided a sixth vote to uphold the Michigan ban. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
”  [Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is counsel on an amicus brief in support of respondent Stephens in Harris Funeral Homes v. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:31 am by INFORRM
  Its director Stephen Abell said that the organisation has never been more active or proactive, has high satisfaction rates from the people that use its services and is helping more people than ever before. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 8:24 pm by Chuck Cosson
  OpenAI, for example, notes it has adopted a policy of training its models only on data that is either public, provided directly by its staff, or licensed.[6]  Recognizing it is important to “support and empower” creators, OpenAI also notes it is actively engaged with creative interests to find mutually beneficial arrangements, such as partnership deals with publishers.[7]  Other AI developer firms are also responding; a new nonprofit offers a trust mark program… [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 8:44 am by Raffaela Wakeman
Mark your calendars—at least for now—for September 2, 2014. [read post]
25 Nov 2018, 4:29 pm by INFORRM
The Hugh Stephens Blog has a post entitled “Fair Use or Fair Dealing? [read post]
16 Feb 2017, 12:21 pm by Jordan Brunner
DOJ has asked the 9th Circuit to hold its consideration of Washington v. [read post]
18 Jul 2010, 4:35 am by INFORRM
  The Times itself quoted Mark Stephens as complaining “People want the best quality information that is available, given in a neutral way. [read post]
25 Oct 2016, 7:43 am by Isaac Park
But he admits that “it’s been a long time” since he’s read Gideon v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 11:00 pm by Adam Wagner
Case Law: DFT v TFD – super injunctions, again – Mark Thomson – Inforrm’s Blog: More on super-injunction, this time relating to a blackmail case involving a woman’s threats to make public information relating to a sexual relationship unless the man involved paid her substantial sums of money. [read post]