Search for: "US v. Patterson"
Results 621 - 640
of 732
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2009, 5:41 pm
Either way, it appears affordable housing or inclusionary zoning ordinances are under siege in this state (see our blog article on Building Industry Association of Central California v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 11:07 am
BIACC v. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 11:07 am
BIACC v. [read post]
18 May 2009, 10:17 am
U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals, May 13, 2009 US v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 10:07 pm
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit decision in Severance v. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 4:27 pm
Patterson, No. 07-20409 (Apr. 23, 2009). [read post]
24 Apr 2009, 3:47 am
Supreme CourtØ Ø Public Citizen's most recent Sup Ct Watch list hereØ Ø SCOTUSblog's most recent Petitions to Watch hereØ Ø Ross Runkel's US Sup Ct Employment Law Cases - Pending & decided herePetition for Cert Granted:DecidedCrawford v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 7:10 am
The decision of Patterson J in the US District Court seeks to navigate a fine line between original authorial control and literary activities of fans, in suggesting that, in the main, fan literature should be encouraged and protected as fair use for copyright law purposes. [read post]
21 Apr 2009, 7:51 am
Summary of Decision issued April 21, 2009Summaries are prepared by Law Librarians and are not official statements of the Wyoming Supreme Court.Case Name: Williams v. [read post]
17 Apr 2009, 4:18 am
App. 1997) (holding the DNA evidence should not be "suppressed on the basis that additional testing of defendant's blood ... required an independent warrant"); Patterson v. [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 4:46 pm
By Cori Badgley In interpreting the provision of a development agreement imposing an in-lieu affordable housing fee, the court in Building Industry Association of Central California v. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 3:41 am
See Patterson v. [read post]
28 Mar 2009, 11:26 am
Such deducted costs are permissible under the provision of the relevant forfeiture statute where the defendant is deemed to have provided "lawful services that are . . . provided in an illegal manner" (as opposed to "illegal services [or] unlawful activities" - a distinction that is essentially one without a difference, and, Judge Patterson points out, at least merits the use of the rule of lenity). [read post]
26 Mar 2009, 10:51 am
”Patterson v. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 5:29 pm
Building Industry Association of Central California v. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 6:12 pm
City of Patterson, No. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 8:10 am
Patterson Professor of Law NASDAQ Professor for the Law and Economics of Capital Markets Columbia Law School Tamar Frankel Professor of Law Michaels Faculty Research Scholar Boston University School of Law Jesse M. [read post]
9 Feb 2009, 11:26 am
City of Patterson). [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 4:01 am
State v. [read post]
Jan. 5 - 9, 2009: US Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals Decisions [UPDATED: Links repaired on 1/31/2009]
27 Jan 2009, 6:13 pm
Northern District of Ohio at Cleveland 09a0002p.06 David Patterson v. [read post]
