Search for: "US v. Powell" Results 621 - 640 of 1,339
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 May 2015, 5:52 am by SHG
Just for kicks, here’s a piece from Justice Lewis Powell’s majority opinion in United States v. [read post]
14 May 2015, 1:59 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 AC 18; [2011] HLR 23, the decision in Pinnock was held to be of general application whenever a public authority seek possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
6 May 2015, 8:11 am by Justin Bates, Arden Chambers
In Hounslow LBC v Powell; Leeds CC v Hall; Birmingham CC v Frisby [2011] UKSC 8; [2011] 2 A.C.18; [2011] H.L.R.23, it was held that the decision in Pinnock was of general application whenever a public authority sought possession of a property that constitutes a person’s home. [read post]
5 May 2015, 12:12 pm by Kali Borkoski
“You can get a sense of how important it was to use [these vacancies] for political gain because the conversations were recorded,” McMahon quipped. [read post]
20 Apr 2015, 10:25 pm by Aaron Feigelson
(Schwarzkopf, Powell, Scud and Patriot missiles... remember them?) [read post]
29 Mar 2015, 2:25 pm by Giles Peaker
There may have been good reasons why it was not practicable to leave the appellant where he was and put the alternative accommodation in the same road to the use to which it was wished to put his flat. [read post]
22 Mar 2015, 7:24 pm
It was one of the express trusts authorized by statute, to receive the rents and profits of lands, and apply them to the use of any person during the life of such person, or for a shorter period, and suspended the power of alienation of the real estate and the absolute ownership of the personal property embraced in the trust, during the trust term; and although the trust might have terminated before the expiration of Mrs. [read post]
20 Mar 2015, 9:08 am by Jeff Gittins
Money used for the development of water from the Bear River and the Colorado River is subject to the repayment provisions of the Bear River Development Act (Title 73, Chapter 26) and the Lake Powell Pipeline Act (Title 73, Chapter 28), respectively. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 7:14 am by Jeff Welty
The Court had agreed to review a New Orleans case that presented the issue of whether Miller v. [read post]