Search for: "USA v. 12 United States"
Results 621 - 640
of 965
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 Jun 2017, 9:12 am
(“Chesapeake”) drilled Cotton Valley wells in Sections 15 and 21 on lands that were unitized with the leased property.[6] On September 1, 2009, Gloria’s Ranch executed a top lease to Chesapeake on the property in Section 21.[7] In November of 2009, Tauren assigned the deep rights (all depths below the base of the Cotton Valley formation) to EXCO USA Asset, Inc. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 6:12 am
From Gruber v. [read post]
5 Jun 2013, 1:15 pm
Texas Franchise Tax: Texas Supreme Court In re Nestle USA, Inc., No. 12-0518 (Tex., Oct. 19, 2012). [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods to protect against their parallel importation into the United States. [read post]
30 Oct 2012, 4:00 am
The Software and Information Industry Association, arguing that “the Copyright Act contains the flexibility to deal with unforeseen applications of section 602″, says: In the same way that Congress did not intend to cabin section 602’s application to copies from countries with a shorter term or compulsory licenses, the legislative record provides no evidence that it intended its application to situations where a trademark owner adds a copyrightable insignia or label on goods… [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
On November 10th, the Court will hear argument in M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:13 am
On November 10th, the Court will hear argument in M&G Polymers USA, LLC v. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 8:34 am
Supreme Court held in Gregg v. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
UPDATE, Jan. 7: Today United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2007, 7:45 am
Medtronic and Warner-Lambert v. [read post]
19 Mar 2022, 2:09 pm
In the United States, federal agencies such as the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA), or the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), and their state analogues, regularly set exposure standards that could not and should not hold up in a common-law tort case. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 7:51 am
(B) The drug or other substance has a currently accepted medical use in treatment in the United States. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 8:28 am
CDM Media USA – Age Discrimination Lawsuit to Proceed, March 12, 2015, Costa Mesa Wage and Hour Lawyer Blog [read post]
2 May 2015, 9:21 am
CDM Media USA – Age Discrimination Lawsuit to Proceed, March 12, 2015, Costa Mesa Wage and Hour Lawyer Blog [read post]
23 Feb 2008, 4:24 am
In an earlier case, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA v. [read post]
6 May 2010, 9:43 am
Rogers, 12 S.W.3d 501 (Tex.App. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm
We disagree.In Hoffman, the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit applied Pennsylvania law and concluded that there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find that the manufacturer failed to adequately test its drug to discover potentially harmful side-effects. [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 10:44 am
Click Here American Trucking Association et al. v. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 2:57 am
Perhaps worse, this standard is stated as being the standard for the Lanham Act in a state law consumer protection case, with citation of but no apparent comprehension of the difference between literal falsity and literal truth that is nonetheless misleading. [read post]
