Search for: "Union and ERISA Law"
Results 621 - 640
of 719
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2010, 2:03 pm
Federal law increasingly is curtailing the significant latitude that employers and unions once enjoyed in deciding the benefits, eligibility and other terms and conditions of their group health plans, including many significant changes that took effect or will take effect during 2009 and 2010. [read post]
27 Jan 2010, 7:04 am
Featured Doc: Communicating for Business Katz, Friedman, Eagle, Eisenstein, Johnson & Bareck, advising labor unions and individuals on the laws concerning the National Labor Relations Act, ERISA, insurance coverage, work-related injuries, employment discrimination, benefit and disability law, class action lawsuits and serious personal injury claims. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 5:00 am
March 7, 2006) (applying Colorado law); Schwartz v. [read post]
14 Jan 2010, 5:39 pm
Chair of the American Bar Association RPTE Employee Benefits & Other Compensation Group, a representative to the ABA Joint Committee on Employee Benefits Council, past Chair of the ABA Health Law Section Managed Care & Insurance Interest Group and Board Certified in Labor & Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, Ms. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 2:59 pm
Employer and union sponsored group health plans, their sponsors and administrators must act quickly to provide required notifications and implement other plan document and procedural changes required to comply with the extension and expansion of temporary “COBRA Subsidy Rules” for “assistance eligible individuals” signed into law as part of the Department of Defense Appropriations Act (H.R. 3326). [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 5:47 am
Moreover, they assert, their state law claims are the types of claims federal courts have consistently held are not even defensively preempted under ERISA § 514. [read post]
5 Jan 2010, 10:56 am
LLC Issues: (1) Whether § 510 of ERISA applies to plant closing cases; (2) whether a mixed-motive analysis should be applied to ERISA § 510; (3) whether alter ego concepts should be applied to ERISA § 510 cases to impose collectively bargained obligations negotiated for an employer's single site to other non-unionized sites of the same employer; and (4) whether the Court should address r [read post]
30 Dec 2009, 6:49 am
Posted in Corporate Compliance, Employee Benefits, Employers Tagged: Collective Bargaining, ERISA, Health Plans, Retirement Plans, Union [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:03 pm
Chair of the American Bar Association RPTE Employee Benefits & Other Compensation Group, a representative to the ABA Joint Committee on Employee Benefits Council, past Chair of the ABA Health Law Section Managed Care & Insurance Interest Group and Board Certified in Labor & Employment Law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization, Ms. [read post]
10 Dec 2009, 4:52 am
The Funds claimed that Eagle America violated ERISA and the LMRA by failing to make proper employee benefit contributions, failing to pay proper union dues, and failing to maintain a surety bond to guarantee the payment of wages and contributions for all “hours worked. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 9:20 am
Frommert (08-810) — release of workers’ claims under ERISA [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 2:45 am
The questions and answers below on the ERISA fidelity bonding requirements were prepared by the Department of Labor which is the governmental agency which is in charge of enforcing the ERISA laws and regulations. [read post]
27 Sep 2009, 5:13 pm
Issue: Whether ERISA section 514(a), 29 U.S.C. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 9:11 am
The Sixth Circuit has decided two new cases regarding ERISA lifetime retiree healthcare benefits under a collective bargaining agreement, continuing to put a thumb on the scale in favor of vested benefits, but recognizing that an employer may have the right to make “reasonable modifications” to those benefits. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 8:48 am
Law Lessons from ALBERT BRANCA V. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 7:46 am
The District Court ruled in favor of the union under a theory that the indemnity provision was contrary to public policy and that ERISA laws governing withdrawal liability could not be defeated by contract. [read post]
21 Aug 2009, 6:00 am
That federal law defines marriages as the "legal union between one man and one woman. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 2:59 pm
Sec. 1341 and 1346), the government must prove that the defendant violated a disclosure duty imposed by state law. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 1:25 pm
The New Hampshire law also provides that couples in a civil union will automatically be assumed to be in a civil marriage, so plans providing benefits to civil union partners should be revised to recognize that this equates to legal spouse, at least for residents of the state of New Hampshire. [read post]
19 Jun 2009, 3:02 pm
His practical advice for public sector employers and unions in Kentucky was two-fold. [read post]
