Search for: "United States v. Douglas" Results 621 - 640 of 1,568
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 May 2018, 3:39 am by Jon Gelman
Richardson, 411 U.S. 677 (1973), was a landmark United States Supreme Court case  which decided that benefits given by the United States military to the family of service members cannot be given out differently because of sex.Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg stated at oral argument:"Mr. [read post]
15 Oct 2013, 5:32 am by Amy Howe
”  Other previews come from Jess Bravin and Douglas Belkin in The Wall Street Journal and Vinay Harpalani at ISCOTUSnow, while in the San Jose Mercury News Howard Mintz discusses what the case might mean for California’s Proposition 209, that state’s seventeen-year-old ban on affirmative action. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 5:39 am by Amy Bray
On June 18 of this year, the Georgia Court of Appeals ruled on the case of Bailey v. [read post]
9 Jul 2012, 11:27 am by David Kopel
“An Act to provide for the valuation of lands and dwelling-houses, and the enumeration of slaves, within the United States. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 7:35 pm by Anthony Gaughan
In the 2015 case of Arizona State Legislature v. [read post]
15 Jul 2013, 12:26 pm by Florian Mueller
The United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit has just given notice of a scheduling decision. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 1:43 pm
Douglas Laycock and signed by a dozen law-and-religion scholars, setting them straight. [read post]
17 Aug 2006, 8:19 pm
  "Why don't you come and see me in my office in the Supreme Court of the United States? [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 8:36 pm
Berman, The Varied Challenges of Undoing Past Sentencing Injustices ARTICLES David Yellen, The Sentencing Commission Takes on Crack, Again Judge Gregory Presnell, United States v. [read post]
25 Jan 2025, 5:34 am by Kalvis Golde
A list of this week’s featured petitions is below: United States Postal Service v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:52 am
Therefore, in December 2011, the Nova Scotia Court entered a default judgmentagainst Handshoe which stated that “`[i]n accordance with the Civil Procedure Rule 31.12(4), Douglas K. [read post]