Search for: "United States v. Englander" Results 621 - 640 of 2,087
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Mar 2019, 4:31 pm by INFORRM
The basis for this claim was that, when compared to the number of American libel cases proceeding to verdict in 2009 and 2010 (11 cases), New South Wales courts are handing down more defamation judgments than England, Wales and the United States combined. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 1:10 pm by Mark Walsh
United States, a challenge brought by young people against the federal government’s handling of climate change going back to … well, the Space Age. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 3:01 pm by Giles Peaker
  The claimants (and Liberty) argued that this should be considered as a ‘modality’ case, as per Bah v United Kingdom (2012) 54 EHRR 21. [read post]
28 Feb 2019, 9:49 am by Eugene Volokh
" This is similar to the standard offered by Jeff Wall, who argued for the United States. [read post]
20 Feb 2019, 9:30 am by Guest Blogger
  And such laws cannot survive even the less stringent standard of review articulated in United States v. [read post]
15 Feb 2019, 6:41 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
The National Health Service is England’s publicly funded national healthcare system. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 4:47 pm by INFORRM
In the case of R (P, G and W) and Anor v Secretary of State for the Home Department and Anor [2019] UKSC 3 the Supreme Court upheld challenges to the legal regimes for disclosing criminal records in England and Wales, and Northern Ireland, finding them to be incompatible with Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (“ECHR”). [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 7:57 am by Eugene Volokh
The Assembly recalls that the European Court of Human Rights has already stated in Refah Partisi (The Welfare Party) and others v. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 4:07 am
About 1,100 V-2 rockets reached various parts of England, killing 2,700 and injuring 6,500 people. [read post]
23 Jan 2019, 4:00 am by Ken Chasse
That’s why LAO LAW at Legal Aid Ontario (LAO) is the best centralized legal research unit (CLR unit) in the legal profession in Canada. [read post]
14 Jan 2019, 2:27 am
United Card Company, 429 F. 2d 1106 - Court of Appeals, 9th Circuit 1970; for an equivalent precedent in England & Wales, think Temple Island Collections Ltd v New English Teas [2012] EWPCC 1, 12 January 2012, see previous post hereand here). [read post]
3 Jan 2019, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
  Following the widely read post on 2017 cases, this is my selection of the most legally and factually interesting cases from Australia, New Zealand, Canada, United States and England from the past year. [read post]
29 Dec 2018, 8:55 am by Law Offices of Jeffrey S. Glassman
Massachusetts, like most other states, follows the Luhrmann Test for causation standards in asbestos litigation, although both Maine and Delaware are New England states that use different standards. [read post]