Search for: "United States v. General Dynamics" Results 621 - 640 of 1,011
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2014, 9:30 pm by Kirti Datla
United States that suggests the president cannot constitutionally control independent agencies because those agencies lie outside the executive branch, and thus outside his reach. [read post]
25 Apr 2014, 5:45 am by Joe May
  National: General Dynamics to No Longer Contribute to Political Organizations Washington Business Journal – Jill Aitoro | Published: 4/22/2014 General Dynamics announced it will no longer make contributions to political organizations or nonprofit groups that in turn give to campaigns. [read post]
24 Apr 2014, 6:59 am
The dynamic of challenge-and-preservation leads to an ongoing effort at synthesis—leaving the next generation with a legacy that, once again, provokes another cycle of critique and transformation as parents and grandparents leave the constitutional stage. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 9:00 am by Guest Blogger
Hunter referred to the case of LSUC v Joseph in detailing the inherent dangers of engaging in sexual relationships with clients. [read post]
13 Apr 2014, 6:19 pm by Wells Bennett
And that’s as good a reminder as any that, tomorrow, Lawfare will resume coverage of pretrial motions hearings in United States v. [read post]
7 Apr 2014, 6:02 am
All records on the Device described in Attachment A that reference or relate to violations of Title 18, United States Code, Section 175 . . . and involve DANIEL HARRY MILZMAN, including: a. [read post]
3 Apr 2014, 12:38 am by Florian Mueller
But patents protect only an inventive contribution to the state of the art. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 1:33 am by Isaac
The United States Supreme Court (USSC) is today hearing oral arguments in Alice Corp v. [read post]
27 Mar 2014, 12:46 pm
He obviously has a perspective of his own on the underlying issues — he was, for instance, a forceful critic of the Court’s Employment Division v. [read post]
6 Jan 2014, 11:20 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court’s 1988 decision in Basic, Inc. v. [read post]