Search for: "United States v. Grant, III"
Results 621 - 640
of 2,984
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 May 2008, 6:55 am
III. [read post]
28 Oct 2015, 11:34 am
Janice In an order recently issued in James Robinson III, et al. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:15 pm
(b) “Alien child” means any person not a citizen or national of the United States who(i) has not been admitted into, or is not authorized to enter or remain in, the United States;(ii) is under the age of 18; and(iii) has a legal parent-child relationship to an alien who entered the United States with the alien child at or between designated ports of entry and who was detained.Sec. [read post]
20 Jun 2018, 1:43 pm
(b) “Alien child” means any person not a citizen or national of the United States who (i) has not been admitted into, or is not authorized to enter or remain in, the United States; (ii) is under the age of 18; and (iii) has a legal parent-child relationship to an alien who entered the United States with the alien child at or between designated ports of entry and who was detained. [read post]
1 Nov 2022, 9:04 pm
In Wisconsin v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
Department of State et al v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 11:48 am
Department of State et al v. [read post]
24 Sep 2014, 7:21 am
Section 605(e)(3)(B)(iii). [read post]
17 Jan 2015, 9:55 am
Virginia decision arose from a criminal action appealed from a state supreme court, and the 2013 United States v. [read post]
21 Aug 2023, 4:00 am
The reason the Court had occasion to consider whether the Second Bank of the United States was validly chartered by the United States was because if it was (as the Court held it was), then it was an instrumentality of the United States and therefore immune to taxation by a state. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 9:38 am
Seaboard Marine, Ltd., Slip Copy, 2021 WL 4902506 (United States District Court, S.D. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 10:46 am
(emphasis added) III. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 5:26 am
Circuit wrote: An administrative agency is not subject to Article III of the Constitution of the United States [and] so the petitioner would have had no need to establish its standing to participate in the proceedings before the agency. [read post]
6 Mar 2019, 11:23 am
Prot. v. [read post]
2 Feb 2010, 12:17 pm
From United States v. [read post]
17 Mar 2013, 8:49 pm
The United States Supreme Court distinguished Robinson in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:50 pm
§141(c) states “[a] party to an inter partes review or a post-grant review who is dissatisfied with the final written decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board [] may appeal the Board’s decision only to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. [read post]
27 Apr 2018, 10:00 am
Any noncitizen who has been convicted of an aggravated felony can be removed from the United States and is ineligible for many forms of discretionary relief (§§1227(a)(2)(A)(iii), 1229(b)(a)(3), (b)(1)(C)). [read post]
7 Aug 2012, 4:40 am
They contend that Congress gave the United States Olympic Committee (USOC) and National Governing Bodies (NGB)—like USA Cycling—exclusive jurisdiction over eligibility for competitions. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 12:06 pm
V. [read post]
